Search for: "People v Mix" Results 541 - 560 of 2,538
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2021, 6:00 am by Jane Turner
Greene felt that a federal lawsuit (LaShawn A. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 8:30 am by Eugene Volokh
A nice mix, if I do say so myself, especially given the argument we are making; thanks to all of them for joining, to UCLA law student Madison Way for her help with the brief, and, as always, to Scott & Cyan Banister, whose support makes our UCLA Amicus Brief Clinic possible. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
In Bissonnette v R, 2020 QCCA 1585 answers the latter question, and its answer is at odds with the answer to the former. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am by rainey Reitman
(Pamela Samuelson’s Commentary on UMG v Augusto and Vernor v Autodesk) Vernor v Autodesk (EFF Amicus Brief in Key Case re First Sale and Contracts, Following UMG v Augusto) MDY v Blizzard (Justia) A Mixed Ninth Circuit Ruling in MDY v Blizzard: WoW Buyers Are Not Owners – But Glider Users Are not Copyright Infringers (EFF’s Commentary on MDY v Blizzard) Capitol Records v ReDigi (Wikipedia)… [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
(Yes, we are those “COVID made me move” people.) [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 1:05 pm by Kalvis Golde
Answer: When I learned that Hamilton was himself a slave owner, I had mixed reactions. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 4:01 am by Administrator
G, 2020 SCC 38 (38585) appeal from 2019 ONCA 264 “Christopher’s Law” draws discriminatory distinctions between people found guilty and people found NCRMD of sexual offences on the [read post]
21 Nov 2020, 6:39 am by Russell Knight
When people get married, they join their lives…at least on an ongoing basis. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 5:33 am by Sean Quirk
” In response to the mixed reporting, Chinese state media dismissed the training as insignificant because, in its view, Taiwan’s military “is limited and would collapse at the first blow. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 3:30 pm by Guest Blogger
Talmage, William Robinson, and Eugene Cook,[8]relied on sincere religious beliefs in opposing the CRA and interracial marriage.[9] In addition to members of the clergy, the religious beliefs against the mixing of the races were “deeply held by many people. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 4:00 am by SHG
Richard Kopf Why CLS proves that Buck v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 2:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
”[v] This means compliance must be shown not only for plaintiff Jones but also for every offer and every sale in the “offering. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:25 pm by rainey Reitman
Xavier Becerra and United States of America v. [read post]