Search for: "People v. Arenas"
Results 541 - 560
of 821
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2013, 10:42 am
For example, consider the Fifth Circuit decision from 2009, United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 5:49 am
It was the Supreme Court’s decision in Harper v. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 3:37 pm
A while back we considered in a couple of entries the issue of eroding ethics in the legal arena: What's Ethics Got to Do With It? [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 2:28 pm
In the same arena, keep an eye out on Thursday, when Lord Justice Leveson is due to publish the findings of his Inquiry into press standards. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 1:06 pm
If the case of Florida v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 10:39 am
Justice Jackson wrote in his dissent in Beauharnais v. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 9:46 am
In 1984 in Berkemer v. [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 8:01 am
Generally, any standards organisation may be classified by its role, position and the extent of its influence on the local, national, regional and global standardization arena. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 6:28 am
Electronic Arts Inc. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 3:12 am
Or Morse v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 3:26 pm
As the Court of Appeals so eloquently stated in Senior Accountants, Analysts & Appraisers Ass’n v Detroit, 218 Mich App 263, 270; 553, NW2d 679 (1996): The wisdom of the principle of judicial restraint expressed by our Supreme Court in [Attorney General v Ingham Circuit Judge, 347 Mich 579; 81 NW2d 349 (1957)], is self-evident; the notion that our courts may precipitously intervene in the political arena and preempt a vote of the people is inconsistent… [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 6:29 am
Arenas v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 11:22 pm
Business people in the technology sector. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 9:40 am
Sullivan to Regan v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 8:46 am
How about asking meat blender suppliers to compensate people injured by commercial blenders? [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 4:00 am
In Elcich v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 9:06 am
All best, Lucas Vazquez Hedges v. [read post]
