Search for: "People v. Brady" Results 541 - 560 of 596
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously evaluated a Brady… [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 11:43 am
War Crimes in the Van Anraat AppealHighlightsHelen Brady & Barbara Goy, Current Developments at the Ad Hoc International Criminal Tribunals [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 7:06 pm
Kaylo, No. 07-30024 Denial of a habeas corpus petition alleging that state prosecutors had committed Brady violations is reversed where the prosecution had withheld material impeachment evidence during defendant's manslaughter trial. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 11:14 am
If the narrative is "Obama is leading," that might fix what some people do when they vote. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 9:38 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITEmployment Panel Upholds Award Against Wal-Mart In Disability Bias Case by Employee Brady v. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:13 am
Rule 8(b) and Rule 14; and 2) the government violated Brady, when it failed to produce arguably exculpatory evidence with respect to a charged co-conspirator until the week of trial. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 11:24 pm
Elsewhere they've been destroyed, though few people believe the same problems that cause wrongful convictions in Big D don't occur elsewhere. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 1:09 pm
Miller, No. 06-11078 A conviction for tax evasion is affirmed where: 1) sufficient evidence supported the jury's verdict; 2) there was no abuse of discretion in various evidentiary rulings by the district court; 3) a claim the indictment was duplicitous failed as defendant was not prejudiced; and 4) a Brady claim failed as the cumulative effect of the suppressed evidence at issue did not undermine confidence in the verdict. [read post]