Search for: "People v. Carter" Results 541 - 560 of 693
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2009, 9:00 pm
" But very esteemed judges have made strikingly similar observations concerning the role of race and gender in the law.O'Connor and Gender PerspectivesIn the case J.E.B. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 6:00 am by Scott R. Anderson
TRUMP: No, by the way, they have very strong people—they have very aggressive people. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 5:59 pm by Steven Calabresi
We should not be imposing one-size fits all national rules on abortion, which is one of the many reasons why Dobbs v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
In Carter v Canada (Attorney General), 2015 SCC 5, [2015] 1 SCR 331, for example, the Court struck down the criminal prohibition of physician-assisted dying, finding that it violated the s. 7 rights of competent adults seeking such assistance as a result of a grievous and irremediable medical condition causing enduring and intolerable suffering, and that this violation was not justified under s. 1. [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 5:38 am by Elina Saxena
” He wrote that “Syria’s refugees are ordinary people who would have preferred to stay at home, or at least stay in any of the neighboring countries where the challenges of integration might have been less, shall we say, challenging” reminding us that “no people this large and diverse can be painted with one stroke unless prejudice is involved. [read post]
8 Sep 2018, 8:02 am by William Ford
Bobby Chesney and Steve Vladeck dissected the Supreme Court’s landmark 1952 decision in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am by INFORRM
On 22 March 2023, the defendant’s application for summary judgement was dismissed in the case of Frati v Bowen-Carter [2023] EWHC 627 (KB). [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 4:15 am by familoo
I have been asked specifically to write about it via twitter, so here is a bit of context to help people understand what it’s all about. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 5:14 pm by Brian
  Illinois courts decided that an award for pain and suffering is appropriate when there is evidence of physical injury, as was established in Carter v. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm by Carson Turner
In a forthcoming article for the Michigan Law Review, Carter Brace of the University of Michigan Law School explains that the Supreme Court in Milliken v. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 5:14 pm by Brian
  Illinois courts decided that an award for pain and suffering is appropriate when there is evidence of physical injury, as was established in Carter v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 5:34 am by John Eastman
One—President Jimmy Carter in 1979—exercised it against Iran, one of the very same countries covered by Trump’s executive order. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 9:00 pm
For starters, McCain undoubtedly will tap into the bucket of Bush I and Bush II appointees, who in general are more hostile to civil liberties than those who served under Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter. [read post]