Search for: "People v. Drew" Results 541 - 560 of 1,316
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2008, 12:18 pm
The turbulence increased dramatically yesterday as a result of the United States Supreme Court's decision in Engquist v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 9:17 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals has vacated a jury verdict in the amount of $1.6 million and dismissed the Complaint.The case is Raedle v. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 6:21 am by Eliot Kim
Finally, former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the Philippines Artemio V. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:48 am by Lyle Denniston
  When any enforcement officer encounters a situation in which there will be “First Amendment activity”– that is, people speaking out — it would be “legitimate” for them to take what people say into account in deciding whether to make an arrest, the government lawyer suggested. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
I recently viewed Allen v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 11:30 am by Guest Blogger
Kenji YoshinoFor the Conference on Liberty/Equality: The View from Roe’s 40th and Lawrence’s 10th Anniversaries In my intervention, I plan to unpack the “child-protective” argument relating to same-sex marriage by using the case study of Hollingsworth v. [read post]
17 May 2023, 6:00 am by Karen Tani
Although not a historian, Wilson drew on historical research to explore the intersection of disability, race, civil rights, and environmental justice: Abstract:Civil rights legal scholars and practitioners have lamented the constraints of the largely intent-based legal framework required to challenge racial discrimination and injustice. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 9:00 pm
Blood tests are more accurate if properly administered and analyzed, but are more expensive in terms of administering them and in terms of having the people who drew the blood and examined the blood come to court as witnesses. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 6:58 am by Amy Howe
And most people have never heard of it. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 7:52 am by Amy Howe
” At the Human Rights at Home Blog, Margaret Drew describes Ohio v. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm by David S. Kemp
Thus, the Court drew the boundaries: juries must be comprised of six to twelve people, and if the juror number only six, then those six must be unanimous. [read post]