Search for: "People v. English"
Results 541 - 560
of 2,923
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2017, 5:12 pm
EVOLVING STORY: Leandra-English-v-Mulvaney-and-President-Trump-CFPB-Leadership-Fight (injunction suit docket) 12/27/17NCSLT as an original creditor? [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 11:40 am
Therefore, the Court found no breach of Art. 10.2 of the TML and dismissed the CNIPA’s appeal.Comment:Apart from the two ways-out, this case also shows that an English term having a sole and direct Chinese corresponding translation does not necessarily represent a geographical name. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 2:44 am
It could have been used to identify very large numbers of people and to track their movements around the country. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Little Sisters Book and Art Emporium v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 6:30 am
[FN2] and Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 8:55 am
In the construction defect field, some insurance claims people and judges ignore the three necessary steps. [read post]
International human rights can help reverse yet another heavy blow on sexual and reproductive health
25 Jun 2017, 5:07 am
Editor’s note: The appellant in R (o.t.a A and B) v. [read post]
16 Jan 2006, 2:37 pm
If you want to communicate clearly with English-speaking people, then speak English. [read post]
16 Jan 2006, 2:37 pm
If you want to communicate clearly with English-speaking people, then speak English. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:18 am
Tinker v. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 7:00 am
Nokia v Oppo [2023] EWHC 23 (Pat) In a new development in the global dispute between Nokia and Oppo that spans seven jurisdictions across Europe and Asia, Mr Justice Meade of the English Patents Court has found that smartphone manufacturer Oppo infringes valid and standard essential Nokia 4G/5G patent EP2981103 on an “allocation of preamble sequences”. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 1:30 pm
The Court of Appeal says that's okay because the clerk wasn't asking a question, but was merely making a statement.The English language is a funny thing. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 12:58 am
In particular, it examines the issues in two English cases, Ladele v London Borough of Islington and McFarlane v Relate Avon Ltd, in which professionals lost their jobs because they had a conscientious, and faith-based, objection to providing a particular kind of service to gay and lesbian couples. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 10:05 pm
Allegis Group, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 4:00 am
Feltz Design Build Ltd. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 4:27 pm
This was confirmed in the case of Douglas & ors v Hello! [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 4:23 am
English, 164 Ore. [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 4:30 am
The latest episode of the UK saga “and what do we do with data retention laws” has been issued by the English High Court, with its judgement in the case David Davis and Ors v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] EWHC 2092 (Admin). [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 4:09 pm
The Court considered the recent analysis of the English High Court’s power to grant injunctions in the case of Cartier International AG v British Sky Broadcasting Limited ([2014] EWHC 3354 (Ch))(see our discussion here). [read post]
