Search for: "People v. Friedman"
Results 541 - 560
of 617
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2017, 1:26 pm
Indeed, Friedman’s view probably remained the prevailing one for most corporations. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 2:40 pm
From early in the twentieth century it has been commonplace to understand that the corporation and its fiduciaries owe their highest duty of loyalty to equity holders, and that this duty requires the operation of the enterprise to maximize the value of their holdings.9 This principle of shareholder primacy continues to serve as the central principal of the legal management of corporate governance.10 From the 1960s, CSR acquired a political dimension as well.11 Milton Friedman famously… [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 1:18 pm
Most people have seen those two books as rather different -- the first interested more in economic issues and common law; the second more jurisprudence and constitutional law. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 6:56 pm
" You don't have to be Milton Friedman to understand that supply reflects demand. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
Friedman, Aaron J. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
Friedman, Aaron J. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 7:01 am
(2021) Donald Drakeman, The Hollow Core of Constitutional Theory: Why We Need the Framers (2021) Jamal Greene, How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession With Rights is Tearing America Apart (2021) David Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 8:40 am
Kramer, The People Themselves: Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review (Oxford, 2004) Danie [read post]
11 May 2011, 6:28 am
As Dan Ikenson and I wrote a few months ago: [V]oluntary economic exchange is inherently fair, benefits both parties, and allocates scarce resources more efficiently than a system under which government dictates or limits choices. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 7:14 pm
If you read the blog or know us personally, you know that we strive to be the "if you can't say something nice" people, but the workshop will not be helpful unless commentators are honest critics. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 2:43 pm
Supreme Court in Hudson v. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 2:17 pm
Why do people adopt? [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 10:35 am
Justice Holmes in Lochner v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 3:27 pm
Peoples, Is the Internet Rotting Oklahoma Law? [read post]
23 May 2008, 11:39 am
People who believe in immanence tend to see the Constitution as a collection of super-powerful principles capable of handling all subsequent constitutional change. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 11:33 am
DeJoy and Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:23 pm
Rachlinski and Jourden’s test indicated that rights protected by property rules tended to show a stronger endowment effect than those protected by liabilities.[12] The test which was measured by a “willingness to sell/buy” indicated that a property regime produced more people who were unwilling to sell than a liabilities regime produced.[13] Furthermore the difference between the willingness to buy under a property regime vs. a liabilities regime was almost… [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 6:19 pm
Conversely, productive property owned or controlled by individuals, especially where that ownership is not under state control or direction, could be understood as a challenge to the unity of the people and a political threat. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 12:13 am
The inspirational trigger is me cooking meatballs in red wine and tomato sauce whilst listening to an argument on Radio 4’s ‘PM’ programme about planning permission v. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 3:50 am
In an industry focused on revenue and profit, where does something like customer experience stand in the priorities of legal providers? [read post]
