Search for: "People v. Harding" Results 541 - 560 of 10,029
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2023, 7:39 am by Eugene Volokh
Plaintiffs faced with the prospect of these harms might choose not to litigate: People who were sexually assaulted, for instance, might be reluctant to continue with their lawsuits once pseudonymity is denied; likewise for people who have been libeled, or who have been pretextually fired by their employers. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 5:55 am by Mark Nevitt
Tuberville disagrees with the Pentagon’s reproductive health care access policy that was issued following the Supreme Court’s Dobbs v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 5:27 am by Will Baude
And this is not, as Baude argues, "the same case as Maine v. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 4:42 am by SHG
If you want to really shred precedent, why not start with Marbury v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:46 am by Will Newman
Supreme Court, in the landmark decision New York Times v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 5:42 pm
The FTC asked OpenAI to provide detailed descriptions of all complaints it had received of products making “false, misleading, disparaging or harmful” statements about people. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
And by the way, we agree with Will Baude that it's hard to see how people ever have standing to sue for nominal damages. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 8:48 am by Eva Lopez
But frankly, we were having a hard time because not many people realized that the Supreme Court was poised to overturn Roe until the leak of the draft opinion happened. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 5:51 pm by Orin S. Kerr
The legitimate subjective and objective reasonable expectation of privacy that people have in their electronically stored data should not be so easily defeated. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 11:43 am by David Super
  In the forty-five years since Bakke, hard quotas have been outlawed. [read post]