Search for: "People v. Ing" Results 541 - 560 of 1,531
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2019, 10:21 am
Given that 658 people did not reach a settlement but were apparently left untroubled, Virgin Media argued that this was evidence that the Applicants in the present case were simply interested in setting up a money-making scheme, not suing anyone or seeking genuine redress. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
Smalley, No. 06-4552 A sentence for bank robbery is vacated and remanded for resentencing where: 1) the district court erred in applying a four-level enhancement for "otherwise us[ing]" a dangerous weapon during the course of a bank robbery, as opposed to a three-level enhancement for "brandish[ing] or possess[ing]" a dangerous weapon; and 2) the error was not harmless despite the district court's attempt to amend its judgment after the sentencing… [read post]
3 Feb 2025, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
The list of generally constitutionally protected speech that would be covered as "endors[ing] or espous[ing]" would be very long. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:08 pm by Lauren Connell
While there have been some hints that the era might be coming to an end (for example, US v. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
Supreme Court session, which begins October 2, could be a critical one for LGBT people. [read post]