Search for: "People v. Juvenile Court"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,131
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2020, 5:03 pm
From Judge Patrick Bumatay's dissent from denial of rehearing en banc today in Mai v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 9:42 am
Supreme Court will decide whether other young people get that same chance.On Nov. 9, the court will hold oral argument in Sullivan v. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 8:12 am
Supreme Court barred the execution of people with intellectual disability in Atkins v. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 7:51 pm
The unanimous ruling in Henry v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 9:19 am
Alabama adopts a new substantive rule that applies retroactively on collateral review to people condemned as juveniles to die in prison. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 3:20 pm
Prior to the decision in Tevis, the New Jersey Supreme Court in Merenoff v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 8:34 am
State v. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 5:56 am
That can’t be, because the Supreme Court held in Graham v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 1:23 am
City of New York QUEENS COUNTYCriminal Practice Court Finds Proper ‘Molineux' Ruling Permitting Prior Acts Evidence with Limiting Instructions People v. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 3:31 pm
State v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 11:39 am
In People v Tomasik, the Court vacated the Court of Appeals judgment and remanded the case to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with People v Stanaway, 446 Mich 643 (1994). [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 6:52 am
The employee, who is gay, worked for the county as a child welfare services coordinator in the Juvenile Court. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 1:41 pm
A new decision by the Washington State Court of Appeals brings this question to the fore, State v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 9:04 am
Case citation: Gersh v. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 1:51 pm
" Dennis v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 4:00 am
ColbIn his draft opinion for the Supreme Court in Dobbs v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:15 am
” If marketing a product as “modified risk” raises the aggregate number of people, especially kids, who use tobacco by making them think the product is relatively safe, then that impairs the government’s compelling interest in reducing juvenile tobacco use. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 8:53 am
The court concluded that, though D.C. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 10:38 am
In Brumfield v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 8:27 am
In 1989, the court held in Penry v. [read post]
