Search for: "People v. Lane"
Results 541 - 560
of 942
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2014, 8:00 am
It was articulated in People v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 12:55 pm
Signaling before changing lanes. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 12:05 pm
The case is Nabors Wells Servs. v. [read post]
Aggravating Factors in Felony Speeding to Elude Statute Are Elements for Purposes of Double Jeopardy
10 Apr 2014, 3:00 am
The North Carolina Court of Appeals in State v. [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 3:34 am
State v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 10:22 am
EXPRESS LANE, INC. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 9:01 am
Because whether it's three miles per hour or fifty really does matter to people like me. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 1:36 pm
The Supreme Court has granted certiorari to address the issue in Wurie and a similar case, People v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
Harry Barko v. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 10:26 am
See Phan v Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 9:33 am
EXPRESS LANE, INC. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 2:14 pm
**”For this was on Seynt Valentynes day Whan every foul cometh there to chese his make, Of every kynde that men thynke may…” -Chaucer, Parliament of Fowles Chocolate bar featuring Carlos V, aka Charles V / image courtesy of Ismael Aguilar Ruiz To go into this nice swirl of chocolate and Valentine’s Day, I think we have to go down memory lane a bit. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 10:29 am
The landowner's actions relying on a valid permit must be so substantial that the municipal action results in serious loss rendering the improvements essentially valueless" (Town of Orangetown v Magee, 88 NY2d at 47-48; see Glacial Aggregates LLC v Town of Yorkshire, 14 NY3d at 136; People v Miller, 304 NY at 109; Matter of RC Enters. v Town of Patterson, 42 AD3d at 544; People ex rel. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 10:29 am
The landowner's actions relying on a valid permit must be so substantial that the municipal action results in serious loss rendering the improvements essentially valueless" (Town of Orangetown v Magee, 88 NY2d at 47-48; see Glacial Aggregates LLC v Town of Yorkshire, 14 NY3d at 136; People v Miller, 304 NY at 109; Matter of RC Enters. v Town of Patterson, 42 AD3d at 544; People ex rel. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:54 am
In Gonzales v. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 2:19 pm
In the end, a claim of ineffectiveness is ultimately concerned with the fairness of the process as a whole rather than its particular impact on the outcome of the DUI case as held in People v Benevento and People v Prescod. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 12:01 pm
But the unsafe lane change gets reversed.Justice accomplished. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 6:23 am
`had [evidentiary] value where people were talking about stuff [Plunkett] believed to be drugs. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
In his recent decision in the case of S&S Family Partnership v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
Finkelman v. [read post]
