Search for: "People v. Laws" Results 541 - 560 of 55,016
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2024, 4:06 pm by Jacob Fishman
For both, focusing on the actual people who practice, argue about, interpret, and implement international law is essential to explaining how international law works. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 3:07 pm
 Here are some of the presumptively invalid reasons under CCP 231.7(e): (1) Expressing a distrust of or having a negative experience with law enforcement or the criminal legal system.(2) Expressing a belief that law enforcement officers engage in racial profiling or that criminal laws have been enforced in a discriminatory manner.(3) Having a close relationship with people who have been stopped, arrested, or convicted of a crime.(4) A prospective… [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 7:20 am
Despite the hullabaloo surrounding the trial, the focus should be on the defendants, the charge and the verdict in HKSAR v Ng Gordon Ching Hang & Ors [2024] HKCFI 1468. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 6:06 am by Jeff Welty
But readers interested in firearms law should know that the Court also decided Garland v. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 4:20 am by Patricia Hughes
They commonly felt it a privilege, or even a responsibility, to speak up against the violence they have witnessed against the Palestinian people. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
That may be accurate for people who were alive when those laws were still on the books, but how do such past laws influence young people who were born decades after Loving v. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 6:05 am by Matiangai Sirleaf
In this context, appeals for more international law, or to the rule of law, and universal principles, must be sensitive to how law is made, how it operates in practice, and how it is often selectively applied and enforced against racialized others. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 5:31 am by Josh Blackman
One lawyer remarked that the ICC typically prosecutes African tin horn dictators (as Justice Scalia called them), so this may be used to show that the court is applying the law to all people, equally. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 4:00 am by Matthew Tokson
They used a technology that could trace people's movements years back into the past, and selected a two-hour window out of that vast potential store of location data. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 2:00 am by Rachel Neave
Proponents of this viewpoint also pointed to the landmark case of Brown v. [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 10:30 pm by Sophie Dukarm
The answer – according to settled case law – is that the term ‘Member States’ refers to ‘government authorities of the Member States’ (see, for example, Région wallonne v Commission (para. 6.)). [read post]