Search for: "People v. Lines"
Results 541 - 560
of 12,000
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2012, 12:54 pm
In Burnip v Birmingham CC, Trengove v Walsall MBC, and Gorry v Wiltshire C [2012] EWCA Civ 629, the Court of Appeal considered whether the application of the bedroom rule in the housing benefit regulations as regards private rented accommodation discriminated against those who needed an extra bedroom for a carer or because their children could not share a room as a result of disability (see here for our discussion of the Upper Tribunal decisions). [read post]
21 May 2012, 12:54 pm
In Burnip v Birmingham CC, Trengove v Walsall MBC, and Gorry v Wiltshire C [2012] EWCA Civ 629, the Court of Appeal considered whether the application of the bedroom rule in the housing benefit regulations as regards private rented accommodation discriminated against those who needed an extra bedroom for a carer or because their children could not share a room as a result of disability (see here for our discussion of the Upper Tribunal decisions). [read post]
5 May 2025, 1:10 pm
Case Citation: Solomon v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 9:03 am
Many people are familiar with the “501(c)(3)” nonprofit designation. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 4:08 pm
As Auletta stresses, he wasn't a lot of things--wasn't an aristo, wasn't an old-line German Jew, wasn't married got a Mellon, wasn't a polo player. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 8:44 am
Several of the majority decisions in Stott endorsed Lord Walker’s analysis in R (RJM) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2008] UKHL 63, [2009] 2 All ER 556 that the characteristics which fell within ECHR, art 14 were like a series of concentric circles: with the most personal innate characteristics being at the centre and requiring a high level of justification for differential treatment, and acquired characteristics (which are more concerned with what people do, or… [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:58 am
This case doesn’t disturb that uniform and unbroken line of jurisprudence. [read post]
29 May 2018, 12:44 pm
In Florida v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 2:28 pm
Yes, that requires drawing lines. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 10:09 am
People v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 6:09 am
In Doris Rudnick v. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 9:30 pm
Conventions play this role because they represent the people in their sovereign capacity, as we learn when we read McCulloch v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 3:29 pm
Coolidge v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 10:09 am
There’s a quiet debate among legal pundits that’s often played out on social media sites such as Twitter, one that probably not too many people pay attention to. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 4:30 am
State v. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 1:42 pm
Haeger v. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 5:19 am
Contrary to the applicant’s arguments and in line with Delfi v Estonia, there is no requirement for the prior notification of the producer under domestic law. [read post]
12 Dec 2024, 11:46 am
Selected Posts on Liability for Retweeting * Trump’s Retweets Are Criminal Contempt of a Gag Order–People v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 7:20 am
Neither Sim v Stretch nor Jameel are directed to the issue and provide no clear support for the approach. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 8:36 am
Case citation: U.S. v. [read post]
