Search for: "People v. Market"
Results 541 - 560
of 9,137
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2023, 7:33 am
–Kuklinski v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 9:30 pm
He reports with apparent gratification that “all across the country, people began expressly working on building incentives into legal rules” (OI, v.1, 332). [read post]
8 May 2023, 12:22 am
The Bill ushers in a new regime for digital markets, and has the potential to be a “watershed moment“ in how UK digital markets are regulated. [read post]
7 May 2023, 9:30 pm
Calabresi credits Fellner with helping him “develop[] a sense of . . . the advantages of markets in reaching neutral—today we would say ‘Pareto efficient’—results,” while also understanding reasons to be “skeptical of Chicago” (OI, v.1, 170). [read post]
7 May 2023, 7:42 am
Warren appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. [read post]
7 May 2023, 12:52 am
The proposed SEP Regulation that the EU's internal market commissioner Thierry Breton presented a little over a week ago continues to disappoint in many ways. [read post]
6 May 2023, 2:49 pm
” There seems to be only one relevant precedent: Televest v. [read post]
5 May 2023, 8:47 am
§ 230’s Immunity The post The Ninth Circuit’s FOSTA Jurisprudence Is Getting Clearer (and More Defense-Favorable) appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. [read post]
5 May 2023, 6:30 am
That women are the peculiar bearers of America’s constitutional failings seems obvious after Dobbs v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:31 pm
Supreme Court granted certiorari in Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 3:58 am
Smart Study Co. v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 10:30 pm
The entirety of the TCL v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 9:05 pm
In the landmark case of Citizens United v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 9:03 pm
The additional information may tempt regulators to intervene in markets in ways that would undermine long-term market resilience and exceed jurisdictional bounds. [read post]
3 May 2023, 4:05 pm
Here is the abstract: This Article sounds the alarm that 303 Creative v Elenis stands to deprive countless people of dignified participation in the marketplace. [read post]
3 May 2023, 11:08 am
And although the one Supreme Court case to address the underpinnings of Amd14, 1935's Perry v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 7:39 am
Passman v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 4:05 am
So why do smart people who should certainly know better put in the effort to try to get this zombie amendment to walk again? [read post]
2 May 2023, 11:39 am
Colombia’s government saw an opportunity in remote workers like these who could stimulate the economy on an ongoing basis without adding competition to the local job market. [read post]
2 May 2023, 7:48 am
ExeGi Pharma, LLC v. [read post]
