Search for: "People v. Miranda"
Results 541 - 560
of 906
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2011, 4:11 am
In the process, the intermediate appellate court touched on the nerve of an accused's right to have legal counsel prior to making statements to police.In People v Cortez, the defendant, a prisoner at Carson City, underwent a cell shake-down which yielded two shanks from around his bunk. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 12:10 pm
See Miranda v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 9:41 pm
Supreme Court case, Miranda v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 3:18 pm
"Defendant argues 'the only evidence [about Jane being disabled] was that Jane suffered from cerebral palsy and seizures, that she had difficulty speaking, and that she attended a school with special education. . . . [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 3:00 pm
Maples v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:45 am
If you are one of the two people who read last week’s installment, you are already about ninety percent up to speed on this week’s relists and you can stop reading now. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 9:43 am
In State v. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 4:23 pm
The basis for the ruling in Miranda v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:05 am
"If you have an alibi, please give us as much information as you can, including the names of any people you were with. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 11:34 am
" In People v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 1:29 pm
Last week in State v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 10:18 am
The recent case of the United States of America v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 9:00 am
It was the landmark case of Miranda v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:35 am
"[H]aving deliberately availed himself of his right to remain silent, the defendant's failure to give a more complete exculpatory statement to the police 'may simply [have been] attributable to his awareness that he [was] under no obligation to speak' to the police, including to implicate his friend in a shooting, and to his knowledge that his decision not to speak would not be used against him at trial," the majority said in an unsigned opinion, citing the 1981 Court of… [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 8:55 am
In United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 8:01 pm
Shakespeare Act V, Scene 1. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 8:01 pm
Shakespeare Act V, Scene 1. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 12:55 pm
The warnings stem from a well known United States Supreme Court case Miranda v. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 12:55 pm
The warnings stem from a well known United States Supreme Court case Miranda v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 3:30 pm
See People v. [read post]
