Search for: "People v. Orin" Results 541 - 560 of 580
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2008, 5:56 am
  Chief Justice Roberts, on the other hand, made a huge splash with his judicial noir dissent to the court's refusal to grant cert to another case, Pennsylvania v. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 8:25 am
When the Supreme Court granted cert in United State v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 6:16 am
  But never have I read a dissent like this, from Tucker v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 5:05 am
  Well, remember when you look around the room during your first class, the people who are really dumb are the ones who lick envelopes at the party headquarters for a decade and later become the judges. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 3:59 am
There are plenty of people who disagree with the Court's ruling and I understand that view. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 6:21 am
  Orin Kerr had a pro bono finger in the motion as well. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 7:23 am
Ohio when they decide Herring v. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 6:59 am
  It just may be, if David Kopel at VC is correct when he writes: District of Columbia v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 11:41 pm
Is the law just a pretext to pull people over and search their vehicles? [read post]
12 May 2008, 1:59 am
Orin rightly emphasizes the power of the populist belief that We the People decide how we will govern ourselves. [read post]
8 May 2008, 7:48 am
  If a liberal legal academic cannot say publicly (if she believes it to be so) that Roe v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 7:14 am
Instead, I'll raise an issue that has been mooted a bit by Professors Orin Kerr and Marty Lederman over on the Volokh Conspiracy (here, here, here, and here). [read post]
30 Mar 2008, 3:50 pm
For example, I could explain why I think that the majority view in West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 10:59 am
Over on Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr has posted a thoughtful and fair-minded response to our study of public interpretations of the Scott v. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 10:33 am
" Orin's basic argument--this video can be viewed multiple ways or can tell multiple stories leading to different conclusions by reasonable people--reaffirms my belief that the Court was wrong last term in Scott v. [read post]