Search for: "People v. Part"
Results 541 - 560
of 25,839
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2012, 8:45 am
The law, known as Part XX, was passed in 2010 to increase fairness in redistricting by counting incarcerated people as residents of their home districts. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 3:52 am
This is the concluding part of this two part post. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 8:20 pm
Saying, in part, that "This is indeed a sad and troubling case. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 9:29 am
A newfound congressional power to impose economic mandates to facilitate the regulation of interstate commerce would fundamentally alter the relationship of citizen and state by unconstitutionally commandeering the people.In Part V, I conclude with a “realist” assessment of the likelihood that the Supreme Court will actually find the mandate to be unconstitutional. [read post]
1 May 2008, 10:38 am
Since there are few legal restrictions on consensual sex between adults at this point, however, it is not illegal for three or more people to cohabit, even if they regard themselves as married. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 2:42 pm
Sidoti, the Supreme Court reversed, holding that the judge's taking account of other people's discriminatory motives amounted to unlawful race discrimination on his part.The principle of Palmore v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 8:57 pm
The people I sit next to on the flights are almost always terrific. [read post]
29 May 2018, 12:44 pm
In Florida v. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 11:07 am
In Fulton v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 6:49 pm
Eugene Volokh links to United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 10:38 am
While positioning themselves to be seen as utopian, the politics strike me as appealing to the fearful, emotionally insecure side of people. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 1:49 pm
That's why (in part) we have fee waivers. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 6:41 am
People v Black (_ NY3d_, 2010 NY Slip Op 08766 [11/3010]) is one of the four cases with Batson issues that the Court considered in People v Hecker. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 10:55 am
” The line between fact and fiction may not always be so clear, however, as Maryland’s Court of Special Appeals discovered in addressing the issues raised in Publish America, LLP v. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 7:40 am
Additional Resources: Manfre v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 1:49 pm
In People v. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 8:58 am
Reece v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 1:37 pm
Or, perhaps, just wanted to be nicer.And so, today, changed the opinion to delete that last line: the part that said "Lawyers should learn that not every statement in a published, non-disapproved or overruled opinion is a 'holding.'"The footnote still ends with "Hunt held no such thing. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 2:22 pm
A sharp instrument is an instrument that can be used to inflict injury, that's the first part, and that is not necessary for the inmate to have in his possession. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 12:49 pm
Sandford, Plessy v. [read post]
