Search for: "People v. Speaks" Results 541 - 560 of 9,792
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2017, 4:40 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
“The public debate has intensified as people increasingly store their information in the cloud and on devices with significant storage capacity,” U.S. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 9:26 pm by Andrew Hamm
” Unlike public officials, members of the judicial branch “do not speak for the people, but we speak for the Constitution. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 1:49 pm
  But that many people "could" be affected doesn't create a public benefit if there's no showing the many people actually are affected. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 5:45 am by Florian Mueller
Four years ago people advocating the abolition of software patents made a lot of noise, including a movie named Patent Absurdity, about a case pending then before the Supreme Court of the United States: Bilski v. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 7:14 pm by Eric Goldman
In other words, people who try to cloak censorial regulations as pro-free speech are actually trampling on the Constitution. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 11:04 am by Unknown
Legislation - 116th Congress Bulletin https://narf.org/nill/bulletins/legislation/116_uslegislation.htmlA NARF attorney is scheduled to speak at the Subcommittee for Indigenous Peoples of the United States, regarding S.46 (Klamath Tribe Judgment Fund Repeal Act). [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 11:29 am by Eugene Volokh
So the Washington state Supreme Court unanimously held this morning, in State v. [read post]