Search for: "People v. Superior Court (Wells)"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,871
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2009, 8:21 am
See Ramirez v. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 12:14 pm
” The superior court agreed, and Hauser appealed. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
PEOPLE v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 12:18 pm
Exempt From CEQA Review People for Proper Planning v. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 4:28 am
(reference): DirecTV Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 10:33 am
For those of you interested in her judicial opinions, you might start with the following from among her nearly 75 published opinions: People v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 10:33 am
For those of you interested in her judicial opinions, you might start with the following from among her nearly 75 published opinions: People v. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 10:34 pm
The appellate court reviewed New Jersey law regarding how the state may prove impairment in a DWI case, and it affirmed the convictions in State v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 3:38 am
Superior Court of California. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 9:56 pm
Super Ct. 2000), and it is an unreported superior court decision from Connecticut. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 6:06 am
The officers drove past Washington Park, where a crowd of people were drinking and shooting off fireworks. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 11:04 am
Socialist People’s Libyan Arab Jamahiriya. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 8:30 am
In Ruiz v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 8:20 pm
Notes for: --Marbury v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 10:50 am
Likewise, in People v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 3:39 pm
See People v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 11:52 pm
On the whole, these are well-considered, well-written opinions that apply the language of the statute and the precedents of higher courts, easily within the limits in which reasonable people may differ. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 8:07 am
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice, which is about the equivalent of a Supreme Court in New York, ruled on a motion to dismiss by the defendant in 2015. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 11:35 am
Labunski (Call #KF4555.L33 2000) which looks at Article V of the U.S. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 3:31 am
As I mentioned, the issue is before the US Supreme Court in US v. [read post]
