Search for: "People v. Winning" Results 541 - 560 of 7,045
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2008, 6:00 am
  I try to keep up on the happenings of my favorite appellate court, and Justice Lippman in particular, ever since he grabbed me by the throat with his opinion in People v. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 6:39 am
Subscription RequiredNEW YORK COUNTY Criminal Practice Dismissal of Child Endangerment Charges Denied; Statute Imposes Sanctions for Likelihood of Harm People v. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 12:52 pm
When in response to the prosecutor's question, the main prosecution witness falsely testified that she had received no benefit for he testimony, the prosecutor did not correct this "misstatement" as required (see People v Novoa, 70 NY2d 490, 496-498; People v Hendricks, 2 AD3d 1450, 1451, lv denied 2 NY3d 762; People v Potter, 254 AD2d 831, 832).2. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 8:09 am by Eric Goldman
Snap * The Ninth Circuit’s FOSTA Jurisprudence Is Getting Clearer (and More Defense-Favorable) * Defendants Get Important FOSTA Win in 9th Circuit–Doe v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 4:04 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Now we move on to the quarterfinals of Category 3, People and Parties. #1 Hon. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 7:34 am by Eric Goldman
LBF (& Vice-Versa) * Trademark Owners Just Can’t Win Keyword Advertising Cases–EarthCam v. [read post]
7 May 2019, 6:10 am by Eric Goldman
This is a prime reason why defendants can win a 230(c)(1) motion to dismiss but may not be able to win a parallel 230(c)(2) motion. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 6:19 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
If that were the case, plaintiff would win, as vagueness dissuades people from posting political or other noncommercial signs and also allows the local yokels to pull down signs based on an unclear statute. [read post]