Search for: "Poole v. United States" Results 541 - 560 of 1,428
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2021, 8:00 am by Geraldine Davila Gonzalez
United States: Gun Ownership and the Supreme Court (July 2008) On June 26, 2008, in District of Columbia v. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 12:22 pm
In United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 6:35 am by Jay Willis
  At The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports that the grant – which came less than a week after the Court’s decision in another free-speech case, United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 5:02 am by David Markus
And when the sole opinion of the day was read from the bench, in a rollicking appeal about when an agency action is reviewable under the Administrative Procedure Act, in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Section One straightforwardly provides: The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.Moving beyond the bare text, it is important, even (maybe especially) a hundred years later, to think more about what the Amendment really sought to constitutionally accomplish, and how its full import has not been deeply understood. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 7:36 am
Snyder's case was back before the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
” The court rejected defendants’ argument that dismissal was warranted because Moments had consumptive uses which, under United Housing Foundation, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
As a result, record systems are no longer single, stationary units as are paper records systems. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
As a result, record systems are no longer single, stationary units as are paper records systems. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 6:30 am by Jane Chong
Most famously, all fifty states make 21 the legal drinking age because in the most important pre-Sebelius conditional funding case, South Dakota v. [read post]