Search for: "Post v. State"
Results 541 - 560
of 91,853
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2013, 4:09 pm
Ryan, which holds that ineffective assistance of counsel in state post-conviction proceedings--with regard to claims that could not be raised on direct appeal--excuses the defendant’s failure to raise such claims in the state post-conviction proceedings, and therefore allows him to raise them for the first time in a subsequent federal habeas proceeding. [read post]
Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission - Post-Argument SCOTUScast
16 Mar 2015, 2:02 pm
On March 2, 2015, the Supreme Court heard oral argument inArizona State Legislature v. [read post]
9 May 2019, 2:00 am
The post Myers v United States Holds President Can Remove Executive Branch Officials appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter. [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 6:35 am
The post TROY RUSH v. [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 6:21 am
The post DENNIS EDMONDS v. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 1:10 pm
The post LEROY ANTONIO AUSTIN v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 6:15 am
The post JAYMON SIMPSON v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 6:13 am
The post WILLIAM BATES v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 12:58 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 1:12 pm
The post VERNON COX v. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 6:49 am
The post TRAVIS BURROUGHS v. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 6:38 am
The post SEAN CALLENDER v. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 6:36 am
The post KENNETH GROVES v. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 6:47 am
The post NADIRAH MORENO v. [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 5:58 am
The post XAVIER FARMER v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 2:22 pm
The question in this case is whether Congress’s 2006 decision to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution.To discuss the case, we have Michael Carvin, who is a Partner at Jones Day.- See more at:… [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 2:22 pm
The question in this case is whether Congress’s 2006 decision to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution.To discuss the case, we have Michael Carvin, who is a Partner at Jones Day.- See more at:… [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 5:04 pm
State of New Jersey v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 7:19 am
The post Supreme Court overturns Roe v. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 11:07 am
The post State v. [read post]
