Search for: "Power v. Internal Revenue Service"
Results 541 - 560
of 829
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2013, 8:58 pm
In March 2011, the Healthcare Supply Chain Association, the American Hospital Association, the Federation of American Hospitals, and the Catholic Health Association wrote a joint letter to the Internal Revenue Service, imploring them to prohibit medical device companies from passing on the costs of the excise tax by imposing a “no pass-through rule. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 9:41 am
In fact, Alan Morrison submitted an amicus brief on behalf of two former commissioners of the Internal Revenue Service, arguing that the AIA should apply. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 8:02 pm
Buying Kosher or Halal products doesn’t result in a tax break, even if you’re doing it for a power higher than the Internal Revenue Service. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 11:43 pm
See Solis v. [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 5:30 am
Nautical Data International, Inc. et al.http://t.co/Om7YJS9vxm -> Canada-EU trade talks set to relaunch in September http://t.co/zdgEAY4zOy -> A Book Review: Stephen Mason, Electronic Signatures in Law (3d Edition, Cambridge University Press, 2012) http://t.co/NjKb9G7Z7G -> Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2013-08-21: What the future of IP holds http://t.co/zEsQuiDD94 -> Switch… http://t.co/taRJK3OrUF -> Case describing UK copyright law, Travers Will Trust… [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 8:38 am
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent (017152-13 U.S. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 9:50 am
See our previous articles here and here Internal Revenue Code provisions on payroll withholdings for Social Security, unemployment insurance, and Medicare. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 11:45 am
Services, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 9:05 pm
Internal Revenue Service employees in the Cincinnati office were asked to further scrutinize tax exempt applications using politically charged key words. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 6:37 pm
The Court did uphold what is called the individual mandate, which requires most adult Americans to have health insurance of their own by 2014, or pay a financial penalty (the Court chose to call it a tax) to the Internal Revenue Service. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:00 pm
She ordered, without a stay of the judgment, that the Internal Revenue Service refund over $350,000 to the decedent spouse’s estate. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:22 am
Windsor paid $363,053 in estate taxes and sought a refund, which the Internal Revenue Service denied. [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 9:30 pm
Second, as with many other agencies, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) relies heavily on informal guidance documents—revenue rulings, revenue procedures, and notices—to communicate its interpretations of the tax laws. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 12:14 am
Organic activists, registered with the Internal Revenue Service as non-governmental organizations or foundations, spend millions of tax-free dollars on anti-GM propaganda and ballot initiatives for questionable labeling laws even though ”over 25 years of research has failed to find any harm from GM technology. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 12:15 am
The doctrine of inherent anticipation (particularly after Schering Co. v Geneva Pharmaceuticals Inc. et Al., commented here - see also, in the UK, Merrell Dow v H N Norton & Co), may lead to similar distortions. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 11:56 pm
Here are a couple of examples:"Since this Court's 1992 decision in Atari Games Corp. v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 1:39 pm
IRS Abuses Power in Targeting Tea Party The extraordinary revelation this week that the Internal Revenue Service targeted tea party groups for more aggressive enforcement highlights exactly why caution is needed in any response to the much-vilified Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 6:58 am
The extraordinary revelation this week that the Internal Revenue Service targeted tea party groups for more aggressive enforcement highlights exactly why caution is needed in any response to the much-vilified Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 6:58 am
The extraordinary revelation this week that the Internal Revenue Service targeted tea party groups for more aggressive enforcement highlights exactly why caution is needed in any response to the much-vilified Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
