Search for: "Powers v. U.s.*"
Results 541 - 560
of 5,304
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2016, 5:42 pm
Apparently, the government never exercises its power to dismiss meritless qui tam cases. [read post]
2 May 2016, 5:42 pm
Apparently, the government never exercises its power to dismiss meritless qui tam cases. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 2:49 am
Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
In 2005, Alice Kimble granted David Kimble and Frances Green a general Power of Attorney over the UBS account. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 11:23 am
Solar Energy Industries Association v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 6:37 am
State v. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 7:51 am
Following hiQ v. [read post]
18 Dec 2006, 10:45 am
Via the District of New Jersey, please find attached the order dismissing the case in Ward v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 11:01 am
In EEOC v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 6:18 am
On May 5, 2015, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in Wiersum v. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 7:26 am
Case citation: TikTok, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 8:41 am
Ct. 2567 (2011) is powerful. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 11:05 am
The court argued that INS v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 9:16 am
Inc., v. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 3:12 pm
Patton, which involves the powers of the Inspector General of the City of Chicago (preview here, and report on the oral argument here); and The Hope Clinic for Women v. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 9:31 am
Ryan v. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 9:32 am
Surti v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
Circuit Judge Laurence Silberman’s concurrence in U.S. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 3:11 pm
The Appeals Court concluded that "this is an expansion of EPA’s remedial power not authorized by the governing statutes," and reversed and remanded the decision for redetermination of the penalty.The Eighth Circuit said in part, "As the Second Circuit held in invalidating a portion of EPA’s regulations governing concentrated animal feeding operations, 'unless there is a "discharge of any pollutant," there is no violation of the Act, and point… [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 7:50 am
Marshall: Stern v. [read post]
