Search for: "Price v. Price"
Results 541 - 560
of 18,250
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2016, 7:10 am
” Madden v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 4:06 am
A more serious issue is the Report’s failure to clearly address the opportunity cost issue, a critical issue in the recent airline cases (U.S. v AMR Corp., 355 F.3d. 1109 (10 Cir. 2003) and Spirit Airlines v. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 8:54 am
In TEC Olmos, LLC v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 12:24 pm
Talen Energy Marketing and CPV Maryland v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 9:54 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 12:50 pm
Moshe Safdie and Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 2:16 pm
” Read the whole case, Cookson v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 7:04 am
By: David Fazzolare In December 2013, the court case of Sandoz v. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 9:51 am
Earl Cadogan and another v Sportelli and another [2008] UKHL 71; [2008] WLR (D) 378 “In determining the price payable by tenants for leasehold enfranchisement, landlords and freeholders generally were not entitled to ‘hope value’ as an element in the value of their interests. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 2:06 am
Norris v Government of the United States of America [2008] UKHL 16; WLR (D) 81 “During the period from 1989 to 2000 price fixing was not illegal under English law so that it was not an extradition offence for the purposes of s 137 of the Extradition Act 2003. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 1:17 am
Hanoman v Southwark London Borough Council (No 2) House of Lords “The requirement that a local authority which had delayed processing a right-to-buy claim should deduct from the purchase price the purchasing tenant's rent payments during the period of delay applied where the tenant's rent had been paid for him in the form of housing benefit. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 5:21 am
On October 4, Orkin v Swiss Confederation was heard at the court of appeals for the second circuit in downtown Manhattan. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 11:13 pm
The whole point of price fixing and market sharing is to obtain the benefit of prices greater than those which would be obtained in a competitive market. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 7:18 am
The government took issue with suggestions that the consent decree was either too “regulatory” in nature and therefore overbroad or too vague so that it was unenforceable.The Justice Department concluded that both opposing and supporting comments had at least one element in common: they agreed that entry of the decree likely will reduce retail prices for e-books, at least in the short term.The consent decree in U.S. v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 7:29 am
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)The alleged altering and commercial exploitation of a nine-year-old photo of a then-teen with Down Syndrome that went viral on the Internet prompted the 26-year-old man and his parents last week to file an $18 million suit in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, according to reports by the Associated Press and the NashvilleCityPaper.com Web site.Holland et al. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 8:00 am
Here is the abstract: TR v. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 6:35 am
A WSJ editorial takes note of the concurrence in the 7-1 Credit Suisse First Boston v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 2:33 pm
McLafferty v. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 7:26 am
Volterra Semiconductor Corporation v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 12:09 pm
United States Supreme Court Public Health Drug price ceilings Suits by health care facilities to enforce ceiling-price contracts running between drug manufacturers and the Secretary of Health and Human Services are barred. [read post]
