Search for: "Price v. Price et al"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,525
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2016, 7:02 pm
Via FindLaw – Alexander Polonsky, et al. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 1:00 pm
On September 29, 2016, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in the matter of Expressions Hair Design et al. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 7:30 am
" Visteon Global Technologies, Inc., et. al. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 10:06 am
* Other people's computersThe excitement and conveniences that the Internet of Things (IoT) brings come with high prices, such as the vulnerability to hacking, privacy concerns and consumer rights. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 3:50 pm
Public Service Commission of West Virginia[8] and Federal Power Commission v. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 4:34 am
Some time back I reported on Carlton Energy Group et al v. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 7:15 am
” Teladoc Incorporated et al. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 12:09 pm
See Hayashi et al., A Guide to the ATM and Debit Card Industry 7 (2003) (noting the importance of “national networks,” such as the Visa and MasterCard networks, in linking smaller ATM networks to ensure accessibility). [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 1:21 pm
Bond et al., Staff Report on Effects of Restrictions on Advertising and Commercial Practice in the Professions: The Case of Optometry 25 (FTC, Bur. of Econ., 1980). [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 11:33 am
Eckartz et al., how do incentives affect creativity. [read post]
27 Aug 2016, 11:28 am
Benchmark Builders, Inc., et al., C.A. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm
But the firm’s interest is in creating positive/bottom-line maximizing info, not accurate representations of quality, price etc. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:44 am
But I don’t have a personal agenda here, other than trying to ensure that consumers get the benefits of competition and do not see higher prices or less innovation as a result of conduct that harms competition. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 9:43 am
This past week, several consumer protection and regulatory actions made headlines: Court of Appeals Rules Spokeo Requires Actual Harm A three-judge appellate panel dismissed the case in Hancock et al. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 6:44 am
Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, Inc. et al. and Jason Cole, et al v. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 6:44 am
Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, Inc. et al. and Jason Cole, et al v. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 11:48 am
Jamison et al v. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 11:48 am
Jamison et al v. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 10:23 am
Moreover, a motion for a class-action against Uber, also stemming from the judicial district of California, was recently granted (Douglas O’Connor, et al., v. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 2:43 pm
The Internet Association, SIIA et al. brief contains an interesting explanation of how "article of manufacture" must be interpreted differently from a "machine. [read post]
