Search for: "Quality Courts United v. Quality Courts" Results 541 - 560 of 4,145
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2022, 5:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
If a federal employee was aware of a dangerous condition and failed to remedy it, such failure to remedy or warn is not a decision “of the nature and quality that Congress intended to shield from tort liability” (United States v S.A. [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 8:36 pm by Tom Smith
Now, his career is on the line.Here’s what Shapiro wrote: Objectively best pick for Biden is Sri Srinivasan, who is solid prog & v smart. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 9:03 pm by Katelynn Catalano
The Supreme Court will review the test for determining whether wetlands are entitled to receive protection under the Clean Water Act as “waters of the United States. [read post]
23 Jan 2022, 1:33 pm
In June 2019, Vitamin Energy was sued in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan by International IP Holdings, LLC, and Innovation Ventures, LLC, the owners of trademarks for 5-hour Energy liquid energy shots. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm by John Elwood
On Tuesday, the court denied review in just one of last week’s relists, Trustees of the New Life in Christ Church v. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm by John Elwood
United States — in which a splintered majority of the Supreme Court held that the CWA does not regulate all wetlands. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 2:26 pm by Patricia Hughes
INTRODUCTION In its December 2021 decision in Ontario Teacher Candidates’ Council v. [read post]
1 Jan 2022, 4:36 am by Florian Mueller
Even if this blog is not among the reading material that lightens up your mood, your interest in my writings is still much appreciated.With the first post of 2022, I'd like to follow up on one of last year's most important court rulings: Epic Games v. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 12:38 pm by Michael
So generally what you do is you go get a home DNA kit you take the test that quality control in chain of custody for those DNA kits are usually attacked, but that’ll give you enough evidence to have a court ordered test in which they’ll be enhanced chain of custody controls and once you have the second test then if the second test excludes you under this family law section which is the “suit to terminate under 161.005 of the family code” the statute reads if… [read post]