Search for: "R. B. vs B. T."
Results 541 - 560
of 742
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2011, 3:00 am
Over two years ago I posted about a decision by Suffolk County Commercial Division Justice Emily Pines in a father vs. son corporate dissolution case called Matter of Wenger. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 2:24 pm
That avoids the difficult line-drawing problem that would otherwise arise if you want to create a show vs. tell distinction in the private search doctrine given the difficult line of knowing when the private party becomes an agent of law enforcement.Applying the private search doctrine when the government doesn’t even know a private search occurred is very different. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 11:01 pm
Das KGer VS hatte den Honoraranspruch bejaht, denn "les services du notaire ont été, nonobstant les erreurs commises, utiles: l'acte instrumenté, fixant un prix de vente de 630'000 fr., a été inscrit au registre foncier et muté au cadastre de ..., la recourante y figurant comme propriétaire de la parcelle litigieuse; une solution ayant finalement été trouvée avec la commune… [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 4:29 am
The whole situation also reminds me of when Judge Morris B. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 4:24 pm
(2) China will not unpeg its currency vs. the US dollar (despite 12 more threatening NYT columns by Paul Krugman). [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 1:02 pm
Related Posts:Disparate TREATMENT vs. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 11:46 am
The list is limited to books that were (a) published in 2010 for the first time and (b) law-related.If we weren’t limiting ourselves to books from 2010, we would have included The Curmudgeon’s Guide to Practicing Law, by ATL in-house columnist Mark Herrmann. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 6:08 pm
Stepped-Up vs. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:01 am
Factor Nutrition Labs, LLC (Docket Report) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps BP Lubricants – United States files amicus curiae brief arguing that Rule 9(b) should apply in false marking cases – In re BP Lubricants USA Inc (Gray on Claims) Butterball – False marking plaintiffs get creative and dig deeper to support intent to deceive allegations: Buyers v. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 1:35 pm
Teachers and professors have been harping on students (docking their grades or even expelling students) for plagiarism for decades – why shouldn’t this prohibition apply to online content? [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 3:40 pm
William T. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 7:06 am
AT&T Corp., 484 F.3d 644, 655 n.6 (3d Cir. 2007). [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 12:41 pm
COMMERCIAL AUTO – PAYMENT OF POST-JUDGMENT INTEREST – "OFFER" VS. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 11:34 am
R. [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 5:23 pm
The case worker responded a few days before the deadline stating that B o A's modification "didn't look like" HAMP. 48 hours before the deadline, another B of A package showed up only this time it clearly showed that it was legitimately a HAMP modification. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 7:49 pm
Many of the stories Wu tells are too complicated to fit comfortably at either end of the free-market-vs-regulation spectrum. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:23 am
William Bounds, Ltd (Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: False patent marking plaintiff must meet rule 9(b) pleading for intent: Simonian v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 4:18 am
Global Global – General 33 (make that 38) intellectual property mistakes and how to avoid them (IP Think Tank) Don’t lose freedom of operation (no. 7 in our list of IP mistakes) (IP Think Tank) IPBC all set for San Francisco as preliminary programme is published for June 2011 (IAM) Global – Trade Marks / Brands Trade marks and brands ‘overlooked’ (IPKat) Nostalgic Brands: Can they be auctioned? [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 1:10 pm
I'm opting for b. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 3:11 am
This so-called adapted problem/solution approach was developed in T 208/84 (Vicom) and T 641/00 (Comvik) and recently confirmed by the Enlarged Board of Appeal's opinion on case G 3/08. [read post]
