Search for: "RE v. State" Results 541 - 560 of 40,097
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2024, 8:50 am by Bob Ambrogi
“Free, accessible, and comprehensive access to the law is foundational to our democracy, and we believe we’re in a moment when big progress can be made. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:03 pm by renholding
[5] Commission Guidance Regarding Disclosure Related to Climate Change, Release No. 33-9106 (Feb. 2, 2010) [75 FR 6290 (Feb. 8, 2010)] [6] See Basic Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
” This is precisely what the Supreme Court called for in TSC Industries v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:13 am
An intriguing headline at Snopes.The since-rescinded memo, sent from the VA Office of the Assistant Under Secretary of Health for Operations, stated that photo should be removed on the grounds that it depicted a non-consensual kiss: "This memorandum requests the removal of the 'V-J Day in Times Square' photograph from all Veterans Health Administration facilities in alignment with the Department of Veterans Affairs' commitment to maintaining a safe,… [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 1:11 am by David Pocklington
Given his decision to refuse a faculty to remove all of the pews, the Chancellor stated that the Petitioners may wish to re-think their proposals in respect of the heating. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 1:51 pm by Josh Blackman
Were Trump re-elected, and contrary to Professor Lederman's hopes and aspirations, the question of whether the President is an "Officer of the United States" will not be "re-consigned to the obscure corners of implausible scholarship. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am by Marty Lederman
”  Perhaps, then, those arguments will be re-consigned to the obscure corners of implausible scholarship from whence they came. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:07 am by Eugene Volokh
New York's efforts to punish the National Rifle Association, at issue before the Supreme Court in National Rifle Association v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
I was not surprised by the outcome or even the unanimity of the result in Trump v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 6:05 pm by Mark Ashton
Mom has changed jobs and residences a bit but in 2020 she re-married a man. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 4:05 pm
Indeed, in most states (say, Alabama), I'm very confident that the state supreme court would literally laugh out loud at the mere mention of any such claim.So in that way, California is, I suspect, no outlier.But here's where we're different.First, there's a dissent. [read post]