Search for: "REED v. SMITH" Results 541 - 560 of 968
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2018, 1:51 pm by Giles Peaker
With great respect to the judge in this case, it seems to me she was in error in the distinction she made as to the passage in Smith v Chief Constable of Sussex Police relied on by Lord Toulson in Michael. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 1:15 am
Reed Smith, a pharmaceutical company claimed that the law firm engaged in an impermissible conflict that led to Reed Smith's disclosure of confidential information to a second client. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 11:53 am by Debra A. McCurdy
Reed Smith’s ACA Reporting Reed Smith has been closely covering ACA developments, including enactment of the legislation and ongoing Administration implementation efforts. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 11:59 pm
The new hires underscore the increasing importance of running a law firm as a business, Reed Smith officials said. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
On 26 November 2019 there will be an application in the case of Kirkegaard v Smith. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 7:17 am by Bexis
"  Slip op. at 5.Congratulations to Mike Brown and Ginger Pigott of Reed Smith for winning Stengel and thanks to blog subscriber Lisa Baird for passing it along to us. [read post]
24 May 2019, 3:10 am by Edith Roberts
For The National Law Journal (subscription or registration required), Tony Mauro reports that the court’s decision in Merck “gave both sides partial victories and has touched off a furious last-minute dispute in a similar drug case involving the suicide of a Reed Smith partner that the justices [were] set to consider Thursday. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 4:30 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Beck of the Philadelphia office of the Reed Smith law firm for bringing this decision to my attention. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
  I send thanks to Attorney James Beck of the Philadelphia office of Reed Smith for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 1:41 pm
This post comes from the non-Reed Smith side of this blog.With some courts, the § 510(k) clearance of a medical device is not only insufficient to support preemption. [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
Beck of the Philadelphia office of Reed Smith law firm for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 3:26 pm by Josh Blackman
Recall that Judge Smith would have granted rehearing en banc in the ACA case that became California v. [read post]