Search for: "ROGER BROWN" Results 541 - 560 of 1,180
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2013, 9:45 pm by Walter Olson
Slate really embarrassed itself the other day with a column by Emily Bazelon and Dahlia Lithwick flatly misreporting the holding of a Janice Rogers Brown opinion on religious liberty and Obamacare. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 4:56 am by Amy Howe
At Mayer Brown’s Class Defense blog, Archis Parasharami discusses yesterday’s denial of certiorari in Marek v. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 4:30 pm by Nathan Mattise
Brown appeared on the same show and was equally direct when asked about potential clemency. [read post]
2 Nov 2013, 12:02 pm by Tom Smith
Circuit's  Judge Janice Rogers Brown taking down the Obamacare contraceptive mandate in Gilardi v. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 9:21 am by Lyle Denniston
Judge Janice Rogers Brown wrote the main opinion issued on Friday, which drew varying support from her two colleagues. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 11:55 am by emagraken
The defence asserts this proposition notwithstanding the uncontroverted evidence that the plaintiff’s hip and lower back injuries markedly limit her ability to do the kind of work that she actually did, and did well, before her injury. [53]         It is disappointing that in this day and age, nearly 30 years after Brown v. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 9:35 am by Stone Law, P.C.
The Court used the Rogers test to weigh Brown’s Lanham Act claim. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 9:35 am by Stone Law, P.C.
The Court used the Rogers test to weigh Brown’s Lanham Act claim. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 9:35 am by Stone Law, P.C.
The Court used the Rogers test to weigh Brown’s Lanham Act claim. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 12:00 pm by Peter Margulies
  Although discerning judges’ ultimate views based on questions at an oral argument is an inherently risky undertaking, questions from Judge Janice Rogers Brown at Monday’s argument in al Bahlul v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 6:09 pm by Wells Bennett
The judges took turns testing this theory, Judge Kavanaugh by noting the Supreme Court’s seemingly equation, in Justice Kennedy’s Hamdan I concurrence and other places, of the law of war with international law; Judge Janice Rogers Brown, by asking whether the government meant to rest on a purely “domestic common law of war” theory, or the theory that U.S. practice serves to delimit inexact boundaries in international law; and Judge David Tatel, by wondering… [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 7:54 pm by Steve Vladeck
 Put simply, the government would need at least two votes from the quartet of Chief Judge Garland and Judges Griffith, Rogers, and Tatel (and that’s assuming that the government is likely to have Judges Henderson and Brown on its side–hardly a foregone conclusion). [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 10:19 am by Raffaela Wakeman
The en banc panel includes Judges Merrick Garland, Karen LeCraft Henderson, Judith Rogers, David Tatel, Janice Rogers Brown, Thomas Griffith, and Brett Kavanaugh. [read post]
21 Sep 2013, 11:00 am by Raffaela Wakeman
That too was granted by the three-judge panel composed of Circuit Court Judges Karen LeCraft Henderson, Janice Rogers Brown and Thomas Griffith. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 1:23 pm by Ilya Somin
Bush administration, among whom it’s hard to think of anyone comparable to the above list, with the possible exception of Janice Rogers Brown. [read post]
14 Sep 2013, 4:10 am by Steven Gursten
The Judge who wrote the Court of Appeals decision, Judge Janice Rogers Brown, noted that the decision “brings to an end much of the permanent warfare surrounding the HOS rules. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 10:31 pm by Jeff Gamso
I hope he makes the best of an astounding opportunity.Janice Rogers Brown is a hero. [read post]