Search for: "Reach v. State"
Results 541 - 560
of 37,546
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2014, 2:10 pm
Porsche, the Second Circuit limited the extraterritorial reach of the U.S. securities laws, affirming the dismissal of securities claims brought by parties to swap agreements that were entered into in the United States but were based on the price of foreign securities. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 2:51 pm
Supreme Court reverses a decision of a state court based on federal law, is it a problem that the state court could, at least in theory, then reach the same result in favor of the same party based on state law? [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 12:21 pm
”) State v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 10:19 am
This decision reminds me of United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 5:59 am
The Brown opinion has been relied upon in both state and federal courts to circumscribe the reach of Concepcion. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 9:11 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Simmons v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:22 am
Wade in Dobbs v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 8:26 pm
See Larry Harmon Picture Corp. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 3:03 pm
., v. [read post]
23 Jan 2016, 10:13 am
State v. [read post]
4 Apr 2009, 5:00 am
In Gantler v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 3:01 pm
" Moreover, in declining to reach out to decide whether a state can ever limit civil marriage to heterosexual couples, the panel not only did not act foolishly; it acted appropriately, since resolution of that question--one that would affect the marriage laws in many states--was not necessary in order to resolve the case.... [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 3:11 pm
Micah Schwartzman, Richard Schragger, and Nelson TebbeIn Holt v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 11:30 am
“We do not lightly reach our conclusion that the state court unreasonably applied federal law, but under the circumstances of this [...] [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 10:52 am
The majority opinion reaches its conclusion that the variance is immaterial by misinterpreting the Court of Criminal Appeals’ opinion in Bailey v. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 1:43 pm
Recall that some portions of Arizona's attempt to control immigration and immigrants in SB 1070 reached the United States Supreme Court in Arizona v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 9:54 am
The IPKat has been passed an early copy of Mr Justice Floyd's judgment from earlier today in the case of Synthon v Merz, which relates to the esoteric outer reaches of how European Community law on Supplementary Protection Certificates (SPCs) should be interpreted. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 10:32 am
Far from the sort of cursory ruling that is occasionally generated by courts with busy calendars, this ruling elaborates on each of the stated reasons for PAGA claims not being subject to arbitration (and thus beyond the reach of AT&T v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 6:34 pm
Beshear, which upheld a state statute regulating abortion. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:09 am
For essentially the reasons explained by the Court of Appeals, see United States v. [read post]
