Search for: "Response Brief for the United States Regarding Jurisdiction" Results 541 - 560 of 1,132
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
§1001(a)(2), which prohibits “knowingly and willfully” making any “materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation” in “any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 8:00 am by CFM Admin
While we strive to present an informative, albeit brief, overview of these topics, we are also available should you have any related questions. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 4:00 am by CFM Admin
While we strive to present an informative, albeit brief, overview of these topics, we are also available should you have any related questions. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 4:49 am by Dennis Crouch
The specification  does not provide much of any disclosure regarding how these binding cells actually work but instead states that binding elements are “known” and “routine” and cites to a decade-old article on the topic. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 4:18 am by Benjamin Wittes
 citizens and other persons within the United States. [read post]
” Cannon adds: “As a function of Plaintiff’s former position as President of the United States, the stigma associated with the subject seizure is in a league of its own. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 6:37 am by CFM Admin
As a reminder, investment advisers in many jurisdictions, including SEC registered investment advisers (“RIAs”), are prohibited from charging performance fees and incentive allocations to investors who are not Qualified Clients. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 3:05 pm by Eugene Volokh
In 1987, that tribunal issued an order stating that it lacked jurisdiction to hear the matter.... [read post]
7 Aug 2022, 11:47 am by Bill Henderson
  Dalio is clear, however, that the United States is once again at Stage 5 Decline. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm by James R. Marsh
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court denied relief in an order entered January 8, 2009.[7] The Court was forced to reconsider its ruling when, on January 26, 2009, the United States Attorney’s Office announced that it had charged Judge Ciavarella and his mentor, Judge Michael T. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 11:33 am by Jordan Brunner
Grassley stated yesterday that he would not schedule a committee vote for Trump’s nominee for deputy attorney general, Rod Rosenstein, until Comey briefed the committee. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 12:21 pm by Patrick E. Knie
The defendants removed the action to the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, Charleston Division, in May 2015. [read post]
8 Dec 2019, 2:08 pm
And absurdity was the order of the day, at least for the positions taken by some of the leading states in this field.What follows includes my brief reflections on one portion of the Forum. [read post]
1 May 2012, 8:50 pm by John Elwood
Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Reply brief Adams v. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 10:46 am by Josh Blackman
DOJ stated: [T]he 1790 Act enacted by the First Congress would in fact run afoul of such restrictions if applied to Members of Congress or the President, if such officials hold 'offices under the United States.' Defendant's Supplemental Brief in Support of his Motion to Dismiss and in Response to the Briefs of Amici Curiae, Blumenthal v. [read post]