Search for: "Rick Hasen"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,068
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2016, 12:41 pm
Early commentary comes from Amitai Etzioni for Huffington Post, Mark Joseph Stern of Slate, and Rick Hasen at his Election Law Blog. [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 2:16 pm
" Rick Hasen posts these thoughts on the Wisconsin Right to Life decision and wonders how lower courts ought to interpret Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito's principal opinion. [read post]
13 Feb 2016, 4:14 pm
Early commentary comes from Rick Hasen at his Election Law Blog, Ian Millhiser at ThinkProgress, and Sam Levine of The Huffington Post. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 5:20 am
" And at his "Election Law" blog, Law Professor Rick Hasen has a post titled "Court Adopts 'See No Evil' Approach in Campaign Finance Case; Major Changes Could Be on the Horizon. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 7:21 am
Here’s the Tuesday morning read: Supreme Court Restores Alabama Voting Map That a Court Said Hurt Black Voters (Adam Liptak, The New York Times) Supreme Court on 5-4 Vote Stays District Court Order Requiring Alabama to Draw Second Black Majority District, and the Signs for the Voting Rights Act are Ominous (Rick Hasen, Election Law Blog) The surprising liberal consensus emerging about Biden’s Supreme Court decision (Ronald Brownstein, CNN) What Makes a Good Supreme… [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 9:37 am
via hotair.com Rick Hasen gives us his dispassionate and unbiased interpretation of this decision at the link. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:13 am
Lyle Denniston covered the Court’s order for this blog; other coverage of and commentary on the order come from Ruthann Robson at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog and Rick Hasen at his Election Law Blog. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 9:48 am
” And at his “Election Law Blog,” Rick Hasen has a post titled “Originalist and Textualist Justices Should Reject Argument that First Amendment Includes Right to Anonymous Association, and Instead Apply Well-Established Exacting Scrutiny in AFP Case. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 5:51 am
At his Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen has an excerpt from his article on election law cases at the Court in the upcoming Term. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 8:17 am
But I'm sure Rick Hasen would think otherwise. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 1:13 pm
Guests: Ari Berman: The Nation magazine Kris Kobach: Kansas Secretary of State Rick Hasen: University of California, Irvine Patrick Marley: Milwaukee Journal Sentinel [read post]
13 Jan 2007, 7:44 am
Law Professor Rick Hasen's "Election Law" blog covered the Sixth Circuit's earlier grant of rehearing en banc in the case at this link. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 8:56 pm
Panelists Jess Bravin, The Wall Street Journal Jennifer Chacón, UCI Law Erwin Chemerinsky, UCI Law Marcia Coyle, The National Law Journal Robert Pushaw, Pepperdine University School of Law Moderated by Rick Hasen, UCI Law This program is free and open to the public, but please RSVP online, as space is limited. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 6:42 pm
And online at Slate, law professor Rick Hasen — founder of the “Election Law Blog” — has a Jurisprudence essay titled “U.S. v. [read post]
31 May 2008, 3:55 pm
" And at his "Election Law" blog, Rick Hasen offers these thoughts on yesterday's ruling of a three-judge U.S. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 2:56 pm
" And at his "Election Law Blog," law professor Rick Hasen has a post titled "Breaking News: Alaska Supreme Court Rejects Miller Appeal, Says Certification Can Go Forward. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 5:52 pm
We had midterm election issues of Blawg Review #82 at Edward Still's Votelaw and Blawg Review #83 at Professor Rick Hasen's Election Law Blog back to back in 2006.But today, on All Harlow's Eve, we've got a special treat for lovers of law blog carnivals. [read post]
27 Nov 2006, 3:20 pm
At the Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen highlights two election law-related cert. petitions here. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 9:01 pm
. “Super PACs are for the 1 percent,” said University of California-Irvine election law professor Rick Hasen. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 3:41 pm
Rick Hasen, at his Election Law Blog, discusses whether the Court should revisit McConnell v. [read post]
