Search for: "Rising v. Brown" Results 541 - 560 of 1,089
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2018, 8:17 am by Andrew Hamm
Question: At the confirmation hearing, senators on both sides seemed to agree with Kavanaugh’s praise of Brown v. [read post]
ShareNearly 100 amicus briefs were filed in Students for Fair Admissions v. the University of North Carolina and Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
18 May 2021, 11:13 am by Mark C. Niles
That all changed in 1961 with the Supreme Court’s decision in Monroe v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
R (on the application of K and AC Jackson and Son) v DEFRA – read judgment. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 2:47 am by Peter Mahler
” As he further explained: The facts here do not rise to the level of Dawson and Matter of Brown, where goodwill did not appear on the partnership’s books, and there was a history of withdrawing partners not being compensated for goodwill (Dawson, 88 NY2d at 672; Matter of Brown, 242 NY at 7). [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 9:09 am by Rosalind English
Foskett J observed that no feature of the Strasbourg jurisprudence has gone so far as to impose the kind of obligation contended for in this case and that it is not open to the domestic courts to move ahead of the European Court of Human Rights in this regard (invoking the principle in R (Ullah) v Special Adjudicator [2004] 2 AC 323), a principle which has found further expression in Regina (Al-Skeini and others) v Secretary of State for Defence  [2008] 1 AC 153  (see in… [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 4:01 am by Deanne Sowter
A third interim order was made in March 2021 after a contested application by the father to have the child returned to Chilliwack (SZM v KMN, 2021 BCSC 365 (CanLII), (which was decided before Barendregt v Grebliunas, 2022 SCC 22 (CanLII), more on the significance of this case below)). [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:09 am by Giles Peaker
This was a point of appeal from Kanu v Southwark (our report). [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 3:45 am by SHG
The concept made sense back in 1984, when the Supreme Court held in Chevron v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
If one separates out the individual parts of the BBC’s conduct in this case and subjects each to the question “does this give rise to a reasonable expectation of privacy? [read post]