Search for: "Robert T. Miller" Results 541 - 560 of 1,229
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2016, 3:49 pm
 At least in the opinion of the Ninth Circuit.In the 2010s, it appears to be Judge Robert Clive Jones.You wouldn't have necessarily thought initially that it would be Judge Jones to be the one to go off the rails. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 1:40 pm by Stephen Wermiel
Evan Miller, the petitioner in one of the cases granted on Monday, Miller v. [read post]
On this question, Republicans retain a healthy advantage when respondents are asked to choose between the parties or options of “neither” or “don’t know. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 6:00 am
J. 12 *** Robert Goodrich, UNSAFE AT ANY SPEED: THE PERILS OF ACCELERATION, 2007 NO. 10 NRTN-BLA 3 *** John T. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 6:54 am by Brad Kuhn
Suntum, Miller, Miller & Canby, Chartered, Rockville, Maryland Update on Regulatory Takings Jurisprudence: Decisions that Hit Close to Home – Michael M. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 9:06 pm by Dan Flynn
Every time Miller comes close to complying, he pushes it away. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
For The Washington Post, Robert Barnes and Ann Marimow report that “[t]he action, which came in an unsigned opinion without noted dissents, throws out a precedent that might allow other teenagers in the same circumstance to obtain an abortion. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 3:43 pm by David Zaring
 We don't get too much of "Fama lifts weights every day," or "Merton Miller never did stop talking about the enormous marlin that got away from him and Hemingway off of Cuba. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 11:27 am
Marx, DDS, Professor of Surgery and Chief, Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 10:15 pm
Mark McKenna has more with a link to the decision; And Justinian Lane at TortDeform explains that the failure of this "reform" made no difference for an insurer's decision to stay in the state;[Edit - 11/19/07: In an email to me, Robert Peck of the Center for Constitutional Litigation, who argued the case, alerted me that the decision was ruled unconstitutional based solely on separation of powers issues. [read post]