Search for: "Rogers v. Rogers"
Results 541 - 560
of 5,347
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2021, 5:17 pm
Rolls BuildingAuthor Roger Green Licence CC BY-SA 4.0 Source Wikimedia Commons Jane LambertIntellectual Property Enterprise Court (Recorder Amanda Michaels) Costa v Dissociadid Ltd. and another [2021] EWHC 3275 (IPEC) (2 Dec 2021)On 19 Nov 2021, the recorder Ms Amanda Michaels, sitting as a deputy judge of the High Court, heard two strikeout and summary judgment applications. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 10:57 pm
Isaacs, who is also involved with the Coronavirus Reporter v. [read post]
24 Dec 2021, 2:00 am
Pagan v. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 2:00 am
Godwin v. [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 10:52 pm
My next app will have a subscription model, but also IAP offerings.Shortly before the Epic Games v. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 2:00 am
Charles Arbogast v. [read post]
The Slovak Constitutional Court on Risk Profiling and Automated Decision-Making by the Tax Authority
17 Dec 2021, 11:46 am
Sweden [1987] No 9248/81, paragraph 50; Margareta and Roger Andersson v. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm
”[21] Under this test, Ginger Rogers and the estate of Fred Astaire could not prevent a filmmaker from using the title “Ginger and Fred” in a fictional film because the use was “clearly related to the content of the movie and is not a disguised advertisement for the sale of goods or services or a collateral commercial product. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 10:56 am
Rosen’s article Katcoff v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 8:00 am
DeLaurie v. [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 3:31 pm
Judge Rogers rejected the allegation that Apple’s App Store is a monopoly and ordered Epic Games to pay Apple 30% of all revenue collected through the system since it was implemented for breach of contract. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 8:00 am
Dillon v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am
Key Findings: Excessive tax rates on cigarettes in some states induce substantial black and gray market movement of tobacco products into high-tax states from low-tax states or foreign sources. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 2:00 am
Ashad Umrani, et al. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 6:30 am
The excellent questions raised show how fertile a field this is for scholars to till.A few years ago, David Congdon, now the Senior Editor at Kansas, told us it was a high priority of his to issue a book on United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 2:18 pm
Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968) Graham v. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 6:30 am
Wilkins and United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 6:30 am
’ Hirabayashi v. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 1:32 am
As long as Apple is not considered a monopolist (and under the Epic v. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 2:23 pm
From U.S. v. [read post]
