Search for: "Roll v. United States"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,955
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 10:56 am
Co-authored by Kara Goodwin and Noah Finkel Pending before the United States Supreme Court is a petition for writ of certiorari asking the Court to determine whether an employer may use payments for bona fide meal periods as an offset/credit against compensable work time. [read post]
27 Jul 2006, 4:51 am
McKerr v United Kingdom, at para. 111). [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
However in so far as they seek to declare it “null” and of “no effect” he submits that they went too far and where they cannot go. 14:16: Lord Keen QC notes that this principle is consistent with extensive authority and which Sir James Eadie QC will address in due course in further detail. 14:14: Lord Keen QC notes that the Inner House accepted that the principle of non-justiciability exists in public law and that the question of whether something is… [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 5:59 am
These are the folks who would want to roll back segregation, for whom Loving v. [read post]
5 Sep 2021, 7:01 am
The Bush administration feared that the United States could then be asked to intervene against domestic terrorist attacks in NATO treaty states in the future. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 9:26 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 5:48 pm
There’s been a lot written lately regarding the recent United States Supreme Court ruling in Padilla v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 4:59 am
Two cases taken by migrant domestic workers against the UK, Kawogo v UK and CN v UK are currently pending in Strasbourg. [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 5:30 am
United States, and more. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 5:00 am
Rolling Hill Hospital, 518 A.2d 1238 (Pa. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 4:01 pm
As the sectarian crisis in the Middle East continues to deepen, Iran appears intent on aggravating the United States. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 10:03 am
In Armenia (and on Facebook), anyway.But in the United States, apparently, there are only two. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 9:03 pm
The case is United States v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 9:45 pm
In Samper v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 7:46 am
Facts: This case (Dukes v. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 1:02 pm
Banks v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 7:06 am
”The Board acknowledged the ruling in Imperial Holmes Corp v Lamont (1972) on the application of section 101 to architectural drawings. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 12:40 pm
" The Tenth Circuit held in United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 1:37 pm
In so doing, it disagreed with the Eighth Circuit, potentially setting the issue up for resolution by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
