Search for: "Rome v. State" Results 541 - 560 of 710
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2011, 11:03 am by Keith Gerver
 He says that as this is asserted as state practice, many will see it as freeing the United States to do what it wants; but he thinks this will lead other states to believe that they’re accountable for their uses of covert force,  as the United States says it is. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 12:40 am by Eleonora Rosati
International – Compagnia Generale Distribuzione s.p.a. v Zorro Productions Inc.).In delivering its new judgment in the long-running (15+ years and counting!) [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 2:59 am by Ben
The case is Gloucester Place Music Ltd v Le Bon & Ors [2016] EWHC 3091 (Ch). [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:00 am
The case is Gloucester Place Music Ltd v Le Bon & Ors [2016] EWHC 3091 (Ch). [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  It is not the case that such an election process to the United States House of Representatives is required by the United States Constitution. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 7:30 am by Katitza Rodriguez and Nadia Kayyali
The Snowden disclosures have made it clear the Obama administration misled the Supreme Court about key issues in ACLU’s case against NSA spying, Clapper v. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 5:00 am by Charles Rowland
Ct. 394, traced the presumption of innocence, past England, Ancient Greece and Ancient Rome, to Deuteronomy. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 1:41 pm by Rick
Purnell, 652 F.3d 524, 532 (2011), quoting Tennessee v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 2:17 am by Michael Douglas
’ (2015) 7 Journal of Media Law 1, 21. [2] See, eg, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, art 19(3). [3] SPEECH Act s 3; United States Code, title 28, Part VI, § 4102. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 2:16 am by Chukwuma Okoli
The defendant/appellant challenged the jurisdiction of the High Court of Cross Rivers State, and asked for a stay of proceedings on the basis that there was an exclusive choice of court agreement in favour of England. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case  Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 2:59 am
v=idAUo_fyHW4 His explanation starts at about the two-minute mark.3. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  Bickel trusted the Court to discern our deepest “fundamental values,” such as a commitment to racial justice that required the invalidation of segregation in Brown v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 3:00 am
In fact, consideration of such factors is absent from the elements of all other crimes subject to the jurisdiction of the ICC, save one: the war crime, set forth in Article 8(b)(xxi) of the Rome Statute of the ICC, of commission of outrages upon personal dignity.This crime requires that theperpetrator humiliated, degraded or otherwise violated the dignity of one or more persons [to a] degree ... generally recognized as an outrage upon personal dignity.A footnote to the definition… [read post]