Search for: "Rounds v. Brown" Results 541 - 560 of 704
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2012, 3:13 am by New Books Script
Dublin : Round Hall, 2011 KF 264 T48 2011 Thirty years of legal scholarship / Thomas Mohr and Jennifer Schweppe, editors. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:24 pm by David Kopel
" In a March 2023 order denying a motion for a preliminary injunction in Delaware State Sportsmen's Ass'n v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 10:25 am by Andrew Hamm
”  It was not until 1954, in Brown v. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 4:08 pm by Bill Marler
The round blue ball structure of norovirus is actually a protein surrounding the virus’s genetic material. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:11 am by Christa Culver
(2) Does Section 514 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act violate the First Amen [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 5:00 am by jonathanturley
Model 1763 Charleville muskets fired a .69 caliber ball while the common Brown Bess musket fired a .75 ball. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 9:12 am by Ben Sheffner
And due to a series of rulings over the past few months, the case appears to be on its last legs.The case, Andersen v. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 1:33 pm by Adam Feldman
For instance, the top attorney by case involvement, Andrew Pincus of Mayer Brown, reached this position primarily through amicus participation. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 4:35 am
This is the fifth in the regular series of round-ups of the previous week's Katposts, lovingly prepared by our esteemed and greatly valued former guest Kat Alberto. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 11:07 pm
" The California court was essentially trying to fit a square peg into a round hole. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Rounding out the state-specific discussions is a cogent offering in § 5 entitled, “Workplace Violence in New York Workers’ Compensation Claims,” by Ronald E. [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 4:20 pm
Sixty years later, the Court's unanimous 1956 Brown v Board of Education decision held that separate schools for white and black children were unconstitutional because they were "inherently unequal. [read post]