Search for: "S. H. V. United States" Results 541 - 560 of 5,114
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2011, 4:09 am by traceydennis
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Cardinal Vaughan Memorial School, R (on the application of) v The Archbishop of Westminster & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 433 (14 April 2011) H and L v A City Council [2011] EWCA Civ 403 (14 April 2011) Marcroft v Heartland (Midlands) Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 438 (14 April 2011) Desai v National Car Parks Services (NCP) [2011] EWCA Civ 402 (14 April 2011) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Deeney, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim… [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 7:19 pm
REPUBLIC OF ARGENTINACERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT No. 12–138. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 12:21 pm
APRIL 6, 2009 - The American Bar Association is just one of several groups backing the proposed Medical Device Safety Act of 2009, which was introduced last month in the wake of the United States Supreme Court's ruling in Wyeth v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 1:15 pm by NARF
United States (Federal Tort Claims Act; Sovereign Immunity) United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:47 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
[…] Considerations should include the student’s present intent, not what they might do after a lengthy stay in the United States”. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 9:01 am by Mike "No Man" Navarre
King, 27 M.J. 327 (C.M.A. 1989) and United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 1:25 pm
It is a long-standing policy of the executive branch to simply list “Jerusalem” as the place of birth, as the United States has not officially recognized Israel’s claim over the disputed territory. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:20 pm by Greene LLP
Under the Act, an employee’s only form of redress is reporting the violation to the Department of Labor, but since the 2012 decision in United States ex rel. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 7:50 pm by Dwight Sullivan
The Coast Guard Court’s newest published opinion, United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 10:05 am by Christine Swanick and Wilda Wahpepah
  But the court also noted that “it appears nothing prevents the United States from doing so as the Pueblo’s trustee. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 10:05 am by Christine Swanick and Wilda Wahpepah
  But the court also noted that “it appears nothing prevents the United States from doing so as the Pueblo’s trustee. [read post]