Search for: "S. T. "
Results 541 - 560
of 742,997
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2012, 4:36 pm
" But "proximate" and "proximity" are two different words, and don't necessarily mean the same thing despite the fact that one's an adjective of the other. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
Reasoning as in T 708/00, an objection under R 137(5) should not have been made. [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 4:42 pm
Don’t forget about Bitcoin. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 10:30 am
Don’t despair, and check out our settlement resource kit. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
That makes the opposition inadmissible.[1.9] The Board cannot share the [patent proprietor’s] view for the reasons given during the oral proceedings and recited below.The decision T 597/07 does not refer to the “nature of evidence” but rather to the evidence as such. [read post]
23 Nov 2008, 12:13 pm
There's nothing quite as sensitive as the law of languages in EU law. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 3:28 am
You can't slice up a priority right, also not with the boardsLast week, the EPO Boards of Appeal issued a press communiqué of 6 November 2020 concerning case T 844/18.The press communiqué is cited integrally below (emphasis added):Press Communiqué of 6 November 2020 from the EPO Boards of Appeal concerning case T 844/186 November 2020Technical Board of Appeal 3.3.08 issued the written decision in case T 844/18 confirming… [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 10:32 am
Yes, that's nice, and yes, that meant that there wasn't much on the victim's neck besides bruises and welts. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
In the board’s judgement decision T 848/93 […] is for this reason alone not relevant to the present case and cannot be relied on to justify the view that the purpose of the claimed method should be considered a limiting technical feature of claim 1.[9] In a second line of argumentation the appellant submitted that document D3 did not disclose the technical effect of reducing saturated fatty acid levels. [read post]
19 May 2006, 6:44 am
Wired News reports: A federal judge Wednesday shot down telecom giant AT&T's efforts to recover and suppress internal documents that a former AT&T technician says demonstrate the company's collusion in illegal government surveillance. [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 8:09 am
But engineers can only do so much when it comes to passenger safety from impact to a vehicle’s long, vulnerable side. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 8:59 am
The glorified commission created by Democrats to investigate the nation’s financial crisis can’t get its act together despite a $10 million budget, a sizeable staff and more than a year to thoroughly probe the domestic and global culprits of the collapse. [read post]
2 May 2010, 7:41 am
The police began evacuating Times Square, starting with businesses along Seventh Avenue, including a Foot Locker store and a McDonald’s. [read post]
26 May 2013, 5:01 pm
See also T 681/01 [2.1.1], where the board emphasized that the normal rule of claim construction is that the terms used in a claim should be given their ordinary meaning in the context of the claim in which they appear. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 7:40 am
Trademark Act is facially unconstitutional under the First Amendment's Free Speech Clause. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 3:36 am
Or they won't". [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 3:04 pm
For the same reason the Board's present decision is not contradictory to T 500/01 [20-23], where it was decided that a claim restricted to a method of producing a humanized immunoglobulin light chain met the requirements of A 123(2). [read post]
30 May 2024, 5:00 am
Apparently, its witness lacked “personal knowledge of tenant’s occupancy of the building. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 10:00 pm
”When the Appellate Division, Second Department, reviewed the Suffolk County Supreme Court’s dismissal of TB’s Labor Law claim, it agreed that the statute wasn’t intended to protect workers from “all perils” which involve the “application of the force of gravity. [read post]
6 May 2024, 11:00 pm
OWNERSHIP INTEREST WASN’T CLEARLY ESTABLISHEDAfter AA sued CALLP for breach of contract and a declaration that she owned a 65% interest in that company, the New York County Supreme Court only granted AA partial relief; finding that while the defendant was liable for contract breach, AA’s purported 65% ownership interest in the company hadn’t been clearly established.And on appeal, the Appellate Division, First Department, “unanimously… [read post]
