Search for: "S.C., Matter of" Results 541 - 560 of 960
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2011, 6:49 am
Comm’n of City and County of Florence, 265 S.C. 389, 398, 218 S.E.2d 881, 884-85 (1975), the bankruptcy court noted that under state law, it is not sufficient that a taxpayer plaintiff “has merely a general interest common to all members of the public. . . . [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 9:36 am by Erin Kristofco
Co., 350 S.C. 268, 565 S.E.2d 306, 308 (S.C. 2002) . . . numerous courts have required proof of a serious impairment “that connotes imminent collapse threatening the preservation of the building. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 10:32 am by Gregory Forman
 Nonetheless, the family court found Mother was “not fit to have custody of the children” due to numerous demonstrations that she lacked appropriate parental judgment in matters involving Father and failed to recognize the negative impact her behavior had on the children. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 3:13 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Douglas McNabb and other members of the U.S. law firm practice and write and/or report extensively on matters involving Federal Criminal Defense, INTERPOL Red Notice Removal, International Extradition and OFAC SDN Sanctions Removal. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 3:13 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Douglas McNabb and other members of the U.S. law firm practice and write and/or report extensively on matters involving Federal Criminal Defense, INTERPOL Red Notice Removal, International Extradition and OFAC SDN Sanctions Removal. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 11:59 am by Matthew Klebanoff
PIPEDA, S.C. 2000, c. 5 (Can.) was enacted on April 13, 2000 to support and promote electronic commerce by protecting “personal information” collected, used, or disclosed by public or private entities conducting business in Canada. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 7:20 pm by Ken Shigley
Law was also in Shigley’s blood by the time he graduated from high school and enrolled at Furman University in Greenville, S.C., but he is not certain how it got there. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 1:26 pm by Ed Wallis
Memorial Hospital ($555,949); Seton Medical Center in Austin, Texas ($1,232,955); Greenville (S.C.) [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 9:44 am by Gregory Forman
The Supreme Court first noted that the family court had the authority to hear separate maintenance actions, making dismissal pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1), SCRCP [lack of subject matter jurisdiction] inappropriate. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 1:12 pm
For instance, if in a suit the trial court allows an amendment application, the matter is often contested right up to this Court. [read post]