Search for: "SEALED APPELLANT 1" Results 541 - 560 of 680
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2010, 10:14 pm
Custom Seal, Inc., 321 F.3d 1098, 1107 (Fed. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm by James R. Marsh
Powell, a wealthy attorney who was a friend of Judge Conahan.[1] Judge Ciavarella was stern in his sentencing, and his nickname was Mr. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 8:33 pm by Steven M. Taber
In a brief ruling just a few hours after the hearing, the three-judge appellate panel denied the government’s request to reinstate the moratorium while the full appeal of the case continues. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 4:55 am by Russ Bensing
  Except it’s a different Rule 16 — the one that goes into effect on July 1. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 9:46 am by Eric
" So what exactly did Brown do sealed the litigation's location in the target's home court? [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 3:16 am
”According to the ruling, in order to overcome the confidentiality requirements applicable to the personnel records of police officers, firefighters and certain other civil servants, satisfying each the following requirements is critical:1. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 11:05 pm
B-K Lighting sued FVC for infringing RE39,084, which claims an adjustable mount for a sealed light fixture. [read post]
2 May 2010, 6:47 am by Dwight Sullivan
ARMY 20080083, on this assignment of error: APPELLANT WAS DENIED HIS SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL WHERE THE DEFENSE COUNSEL WAS PREJUDICIALLY DEFICIENT BY: (1) FAILING TO MAKE A MOTION TO SUPPRESS APPELLANT’S SWORN STATEMENT TO CID; (2) FAILING TO FULLY INVESTIGATE THE CASE; AND (3) FAILING TO PRESENT A SENTENCING CASE. [read post]
1 May 2010, 6:14 am by Andrew Frisch
Furthermore, before sealing a document, the district court must identify and articulate “an overriding interest based on findings that [a seal] is essential to preserve higher values and is narrowly tailored to serve that interest. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:00 am
Bush v New York State Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders, 2010 NY Slip Op 03441, decided on April 27, 2010, the Appellate Division said that requiring Bush to register under the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law Article 6-C) does not violate the ex post facto clause of the federal constitution (US Constitution Article I, §10[1]), the due process clauses of the state or federal constitutions (NY Constitution, Article I, § 6; US Constitution, Amendment XIV),… [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 7:31 am by admin
Smith   [Concluded from yesterday's Part 2 and the previous Part 1.] [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 3:02 pm by Oliver G. Randl
In this regard, the respondent drew in particular attention to divisional application EP 1 795 246, in the name of the appellant. [5.2] Granted claim 1 of said European patent EP-B-1 795 246, which stems from a divisional application of the application underlying the patent in suit, is directed to an air cleaner including a housing having a housing compartment and a removable cover and further comprising a removable and replaceable filter element arrangement… [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Document E1 reveals all the features of claim 1 in accordance with the main request except for claim item (b)(i). [read post]