Search for: "SMITH v. KENNEDY"
Results 541 - 560
of 628
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2011, 8:11 am
To that extent, as I discuss here, the UK Supreme Court's recent decision in Smith v Secretary of State for Defence, in which it held that UK soldiers do not have rights against the UK under the ECHR when operating outside an area under UK effective control, was in accordance with the principle of universality. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 4:55 am
The Court of Appeal (Lord Justices Pill and Patten, plus Sir Paul Kennedy) agreed. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 3:31 am
Padilla v. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 2:01 pm
Special Counsel Jack Smith has concluded that he can prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that several private lawyers acted as co-conspirators in former President Donald Trump’s criminal effort to overturn the legitimate results of the 2020 presidential election. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 8:29 am
Arizona in Dickerson v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
Smith, in which the Court prohibited an after-the-fact referendum from interfering with a state’s (already finalized) ratification of a federal constitutional amendment under Article V of the Constitution, which also uses the word “Legislature. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
Case style: Neese v. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:01 am
” Similarly, as Kennedy J of the US Supreme Court said in a 2005 review of a supermax prison: It is “more restrictive than any other form of incarceration in [that state]”. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
On November 14, 2014, in Priests for Life v. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 8:54 am
14 In Eldred v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 2:09 pm
Smith was disbarred, as recommended by the hearing officer. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Evans v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 12:46 pm
Smith decision (a decision that I myself support, though I also support the existence of jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction Religious Freedom Restoration Act statutes). [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 10:02 am
After eight years of regulatory roadblocks, Continental sued the CAB (Continental Airlines v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:01 am
Edward Hartnett at Concurring Opinions considered Justice Anthony Kennedy as the particular target of the argument and briefing by anti-ACA advocate Paul Clement: "Paul Clement and Justice Kennedy" Tom Smith of The Right Coast perceives the ACA structure as "An insurance scheme that is not insurance paid for by penalties that are not penalties" A related link, via the Twitter: RT @APribetic RT @carlgardner Written… [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:01 am
Edward Hartnett at Concurring Opinions considered Justice Anthony Kennedy as the particular target of the argument and briefing by anti-ACA advocate Paul Clement: "Paul Clement and Justice Kennedy" Tom Smith of The Right Coast perceives the ACA structure as "An insurance scheme that is not insurance paid for by penalties that are not penalties" A related link, via the Twitter: RT @APribetic RT @carlgardner Written… [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:01 am
Edward Hartnett at Concurring Opinions considered Justice Anthony Kennedy as the particular target of the argument and briefing by anti-ACA advocate Paul Clement: "Paul Clement and Justice Kennedy" Tom Smith of The Right Coast perceives the ACA structure as "An insurance scheme that is not insurance paid for by penalties that are not penalties" A related link, via the Twitter: RT @APribetic RT @carlgardner Written… [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am
Having spent my time and energy on the first seven cases, I’m going to be fairly summary for the last six; Smith v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 12:08 pm
Smith & Nephew Richards Inc., 1996 WL 593780 (Tx. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 11:58 am
This is Tom Goldstein and Justice David Souter in Georgia v. [read post]
