Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF J. S." Results 541 - 560 of 15,813
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2023, 4:17 pm by Eugene Volokh
The plaintiff—A.M.'s mother, suing on A.M.'s behalf—opposed the sealing, but the court disagreed: Fundamentally "[j]udicial records belong to the American people; they are public, not private, documents. [read post]
16 Dec 2023, 6:34 am by Guest Author
United States, 512 U.S. 452, 464 (1994) (Scalia, J., concurring). [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 6:09 am by Alden Abbott
One of the hallmarks of Chair Khan’s tenure has been the FTC’s centralization of authority throughout the administrative state, acting as a vehicle for policy through the FTC’s ostensibly broad authority. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
The necessary party Defendant argued that the coverage action should be dismissed in light of the federal court’s limited discretionary authority to review insurance coverage issues where there was a pending state court proceeding that did not implicate federal interest. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
In the beginning, the Attorney General of New Jersey, John J. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 5:00 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
” Crucially, the Court held that the states obligation of disclosure in the public interest persists even in emergency situations (para 48). [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 2:06 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
For example, under the law of idea misappropriation -- which varies from state to state -- if you submit a story idea to someone, and the idea is used, provided there was a prior understanding you would be paid for your idea, an enforceable contract may exist. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 2:06 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
For example, under the law of idea misappropriation -- which varies from state to state -- if you submit a story idea to someone, and the idea is used, provided there was a prior understanding you would be paid for your idea, an enforceable contract may exist. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 1:27 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
And he grounded his claimed right to intervene in the case in his "unique and substantial personal interests as a candidate for re-election to the Office of President" rather than in any official interest in exercising the office's duties. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 10:52 am by Ben Sperry
United States, 250 U.S. 616, 630 (1919) (Holmes, J., dissenting)). [read post]