Search for: "STATE v BURNS"
Results 541 - 560
of 3,326
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2007, 3:44 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Charman v Charman [2007] EWCA Civ 503 (24 May 2007) Ford-Camber Ltd. v Deanminster Ltd & Anor [2007] EWCA Civ 458 (24 May 2007) Experience Hendrix LLC v Purple Haze Records Ltd & Ors [2007] EWCA Civ 501 (24 May 2007) KR (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] EWCA Civ 514 (24 May 2007) Framlington Group Ltd & Anor v Barnetson [2007] EWCA Civ 502 (24 May 2007) Howard De… [read post]
16 May 2023, 12:59 pm
The United States Forest Service granted a timber permit for doing just that way up in the Idaho panhandle -- that strip of land way up north near Canada. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 5:04 am
Lokai Holdings LLC v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 3:42 am
State v. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 10:09 am
Nance v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
Exemptions are construed "narrowly, and an agency has the burden of demonstrating that an exemption applies 'by articulating a particularized and specific justification for denying access'" (Matter of Kosmider v Whitney, 34 NY3d 48, 54, quoting Matter of Capital Newspapers Div. of Hearst Corp. v Burns, 67 NY2d 562, 566; see Matter of Abdur-Rashid v New York City Police Dept., 31 NY3d 217, 225). [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
Exemptions are construed "narrowly, and an agency has the burden of demonstrating that an exemption applies 'by articulating a particularized and specific justification for denying access'" (Matter of Kosmider v Whitney, 34 NY3d 48, 54, quoting Matter of Capital Newspapers Div. of Hearst Corp. v Burns, 67 NY2d 562, 566; see Matter of Abdur-Rashid v New York City Police Dept., 31 NY3d 217, 225). [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 5:45 am
State v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 3:20 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 10:47 am
Although this country barely bats an eye at the treasonous Gunpowder Plot, England treats the day as an unofficial holiday, replete with fireworks, revelry, and burning effigies of Mr. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 7:08 am
Here is the opinion in Ohlsen v. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 3:11 pm
” (State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 5:51 am
., LLC v. [read post]
15 Jun 2008, 10:00 pm
In Irizarry v. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 6:00 am
I faxed the Conti v. [read post]
9 Jun 2018, 5:50 am
The United States Supreme Court’s ruling on June 4, 2018, in Masterpiece Cakeshop Ltd. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 6:24 pm
The post SCOTUS Update: Glossip v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 4:09 pm
In Munim Abdul and Others v Director of Public Prosecutions [2011] EWHC 247 (Admin) the High Court ruled that prosecution of a group of people who had shouted slogans, including, “burn in hell”, “baby killers” and “rapists” at a parade of British soldiers, was not a breach of their right to freedom of expression, protected by Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 6:36 am
That's Burns v. [read post]
