Search for: "STATE v SHARP"
Results 541 - 560
of 2,836
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2024, 6:41 am
Case Citation: Griner v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 9:00 pm
Notable state judicial review under state constitutions in fact predated the Philadelphia Convention and Marbury v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 4:35 am
Ga. 2008), nor Sharp v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 9:36 am
Only yesterday the IPKat reported on Case C-207/10 Paranova Danmark A/S, Paranova Pack A/S v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. [read post]
28 Oct 2023, 1:29 pm
United States, 381 F.3d 444, 450 (5th Cir. 2004); see also Crawford Fitting Co. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 4:13 am
On Friday, the court removed Salt River Agricultural Improvement and Power District v. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 8:09 am
State v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 5:07 am
Missouri, the former Missouri v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 1:49 am
Sharp Elecs. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 1:32 pm
The Supreme Court briefing is now complete in Riegel v. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 1:54 pm
Sharp LJ answered them in favour of the authority. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 12:46 pm
Pacific Mercantile Bank, 07 C.D.O.S. 979 (Jan. 25, 2001).In this case, the court noted no California state court had addressed the question of "whether a right to rescind under TILA applies on a class-wide basis, and the issue remains a matter of sharp debate among other courts. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 7:00 am
In sharp contrast, the current Administration opposed the use of affirmative action at the University of Michigan, and other efforts to promote diversity. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 2:53 am
As I have been waiting for the USSC to issue an opinion in Kennedy v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 9:25 am
In ONEOK v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 5:03 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Larry Craig v. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
Instead, the Court first observed that the “…2003 amendment reversed the effect of Sharp v. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 6:30 am
District Judge Allen Sharp ruled in favor of Indiana Right to Life, saying the state's code of conduct for judges was unconstitutional because it broadly forbade judicial candidates from stating their views on legal issues. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 1:17 pm
Pritchett v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 9:40 am
Sebelius, and United States v. [read post]
