Search for: "STATE v. AMARAL"
Results 541 - 560
of 654
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2011, 1:18 pm
Our mission is to show that originalism leads to Justice Ginsburg’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 1:24 pm
State tuition has gone up dramatically because it is no longer subsidized. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 9:12 am
(My friend Vik Amar has written a very intelligent commentary on this question which can be found at http://verdict.justia.com/2011/10/28/an-update-on-the-fisher-v-university-of-texas-affirmative-action-case.) [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 8:15 pm
The United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals held in United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 7:35 am
” In an op-ed for Forbes, Frank Miniter argues that the Court should hold that warrantless GPS tracking is a violation of the Fourth Amendment in United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 6:23 am
At Verdict, Vikram David Amar discusses the Court’s summary reversal of the Ninth Circuit last week in the habeas case of Cavazos v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 3:30 am
Ricci v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
Also at Verdict, Vikram Amar analyzes the possible procedural defects in Fisher v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 2:42 pm
Again this Court in another Constitution Bench decision in the case of Amar Chandra Chakraborty v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 6:33 am
Today in the Community we are discussing Arizona v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 5:31 am
Carr and Reynolds v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:01 am
At VERDICT, Vikram Amar analyzes the issues in M.B.Z. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 9:24 am
REV. 181 (2009); see also Ellen Katz, From Bush v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 7:04 am
Briefly: At Verdict, Vikram David Amar examines the issues in Fisher v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 12:37 pm
Gibbons Addison, Note, A proposed wealth distribution system based on the underlying premise of revenue sharing in American pro sports, 89 TEXAS LAW REVIEW 1179 (2011) Vikram David Amar, The NCAA as regulator, litigant, and state actor, 52 BOSTON COLLEGE LAW REVIEW 415 (2011) Andrew D. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 8:04 am
Holder, and HHS v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 6:58 am
Lopez, United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 1:38 pm
Even the leading academic supporters of Obamacare’s constitutionality, such as Yale law professors Akhil Amar and Jack Balkin, use the term, as did Time magazine’s managing editor Richard Stengel in his recent cover story about the Constitution. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:53 am
originalists, or originalists who became touchstones for conservatives), we begin to see the development of the originalist v. originalist dynamic for the first time in post-war constitutional discourse, a sure sign of intellectual influence realized (see, e.g., today, liberal originalists like Akhil Amar and Jack Balkin). [read post]
