Search for: "STATE v. FLOYD" Results 541 - 560 of 849
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2013, 6:50 am by Legal Talk Network
“It’s impossible to figure out exactly what the judge did wrong,” University of Pennsylvania Law Professor Kermit Roosevelt says, discussing Federal District Court Judge Shira Scheindlin’s removal from Floyd, et al. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 11:50 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
District Court for the Southern District of New York – to appear on her own behalf in order to seek reconsideration of the Second Circuit’s decision to reassign the case of Floyd v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 12:49 pm
That this should be necessary demonstrates the dysfunctional state of the SPC system at present. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 8:03 am
J & J Sports states that it is the exclusive domestic commercial distributor of Star Power: Floyd Mayweather, Jr. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 9:08 am
J & J Sports states that it is the exclusive domestic commercial distributor of Star Power: Floyd Mayweather, Jr. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 10:36 am
Then, that was a panel discussion that additionally included Lord Justice Floyd (also sitting on the UPC Rules of Procedure Committee), Alan Johnson (Bristows), and Richard Vary (Nokia). [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 4:54 am by Jeff Gamso
Read Judge Scheindlin's opinion in the Stop and Frisk case, Floyd v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 2:53 pm
One such case is Generics [UK] Ltd (t/a Mylan) v Yeda Research And Development Co Ltd and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 925, decided yesterday by a three-man Court of Appeal for England and Wales which consisted of two specialist IP judges -- Lords Justices Kitchin and Floyd -- together with Lord Justice Moses. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 7:47 pm
Courageous educator Gilda Day files her appeal to the State Board of Education as reported in the Rome News Tribune: Brief of Appellant Gilda Day v Floyd County Board of Education Final (1) Williams Oinonen LLC represents educators all over Georgia. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 3:59 pm
Vringo also cited the dicta of Mr Justice Floyd (as he then was) in IPCom v Nokia [2009] EWHC 1017 where, when asked to order a trial of a preliminary issue to determine the FRAND licence terms in relation to IPCom's patent in suit, he stated that: "...What is at stake between parties in portfolio patent litigation of this kind is usually the sum of money which will enable the grant of a worldwide licence under the entire portfolio. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 3:46 pm
 The English courts have referred to this mechanism both in the High Court (Floyd J's dicta in Nokia v IPCom) and Birss J when he was sitting in the Patents County Court in relation to copyright cases: "In cases like this the preliminary issue being decided is on a tangible basis. [read post]
31 May 2013, 8:54 am by Amanda Frost
Service Employees International Union, Local 1000 (public sector union fees); and United States v. [read post]